Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

NetQuarterLatte t1_jcd5vfp wrote

>If they commit crime after crime then they'd eventually be convicted

Not if they never show up to trial.

>and put in jail

That depends on the crime.

For example, if someone keeps playing the knock out game and never seriously injury anyone, that will be a misdemeanor assault at best, and that person can avoid jail forever.

>So the idea that the lack of pretrial detention creates all these repeat offenders is bogus.

I don't think any law creates repeat offenders. That's not my position.

However, the law should be able to stop repeat offenders.

And there are clear loopholes right now.

2

matzoh_ball t1_jcdhr8b wrote

If you don’t show up for court - especially repeatedly - there’ll be an arrest warrant and you’ll be locked up.

I agree with you that the law can and should be improved. That said, the harm-harm guideline that was introduced with the bail amendments in July 2020 addresses a large swath of the “repeat offenders” who people are rightly concerned about.

2

NetQuarterLatte t1_jcdtr6y wrote

Arrest warrants don’t do much though. At least in NYC.

Yuna Lee’s killer was arrested for a misdemeanor, and even though he had an arrest warrant another crime, he was still released (and committed that murder shortly after).

2

matzoh_ball t1_jcdwfzl wrote

There’s always exceptions but the vast majority of people who repeatedly miss court appearances have an arrest warrant issued and are eventually arrested. The fact that it was a big deal that Yuna Lee’s murderer had not been arrested is precisely part of the reason it was such a big deal.

1

NetQuarterLatte t1_jcdy50v wrote

He was arrested though.

I think the problem with an arrest warrant is that it’s only to bring him in front of a judge.

If the court can’t hold a trial right then and there, then they have to release him if it’s a misdemeanor.

2