Submitted by natekrinsky t3_11lwf9w in nyc
cocktails5 t1_jbhxtcc wrote
Reply to comment by CactusBoyScout in With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
No it's because they neglected to put asset limits on HDFC purchases. The HDFC market is warped by asset rich people who haven't had an income in two years and thus aren't restricted by the income limits. The income limits make it so that anybody that falls within those limits can't afford the purchase price even with a mortgage when they're competing against these asset rich/no income cash offers. And the co-op owners know that they can get more money in the sale by going after those people.
I've seen some particular egregious examples where the income limit is like $50k/yr and the unit is listed at over a million dollars. Rich people love it because they still get to take advantage of the tax abatements/low maintenance.
CactusBoyScout t1_jbhymr3 wrote
I’m not sure why you’re confidently asserting that it’s only the explanation you’re offering.
I’ve looked into the HDFC buildings near me. The all-cash ones were cheaper than ones that took mortgages when you looked at comparable units. Clearly they’re not getting more money.
And I asked my realtor friend who lives in an HDFC unit and she said it’s almost always bad finances and an inability to get approved by banks.
Sounds like you’re looking at some pretty extreme cases likely in Manhattan based on the pricing.
cocktails5 t1_jbi3lea wrote
Here's a recent example:
https://streeteasy.com/sale/1648536
$220k/yr income limit for a family of 4. Nobody is ever going to get a mortgage approved for that place within that income limit.
https://streeteasy.com/sale/1631168
1.1 million studio, 154k income limit.
Chewwy987 t1_je0j55y wrote
These buildings might have better financials csudd ask price I’d higher or the old owners of the hdfc unit decided to cash in and make bsnk
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments