ShadownetZero t1_jb5id7n wrote
Reply to comment by mostly_a_lurker_here in Exploding e-scooter battery sets off massive fire, 'extraordinary damage' in Bronx supermarket by OntheRunfromCIA
Unless there's an easy way to identify these batteries (or an enforced way to prevent them from being sold) - a blanket ban is the only way buildings can really handle this.
mostly_a_lurker_here t1_jb5y35r wrote
That's not true, some buildings' management already handle this without a blanket ban. You can allow people to register their devices with the building, check for reputable brands and UL-listed components, and educate with rules and flyers throughout the building (that define where to charge, how to not use extension cords, be present while charging, etc).
I would also say that it's pretty easy to identify crapware from reliable batteries. Fly e-bikes, generic AliExpress stuff, cheap conversion kits, you can see those outright. Brands such as Lectric, Ride1up, Rad Power, are all solid. Scooters such as Razer or Ninebot, good. No-name scooters and hoverboards, bad.
phoenixmatrix t1_jbb08aq wrote
How do you track who has registered them and who didn't in a building of hundreds of people with constant guests coming in and out?
Its like buildings that require pets to be registered. They kindda check when you move in (maybe), but after that its essentially free for all, since its impossible for the building to keep track.
mostly_a_lurker_here t1_jb9lyie wrote
And you couldn't have been proven more wrong, /u/ShadownetZero , about blanket ban being the only way. This was just in the news today. https://electrek.co/2023/03/07/nyc-banning-electric-bikes-without-ul-batteries-fires/
ShadownetZero t1_jb9mhu3 wrote
We're talking about building bans. Thanks for paying attention.
Take the L.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments