Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

KaiDaiz t1_j9m9smf wrote

Charters and traditional public share the same overall education budget. As more students flock to charter...the NYC DOE share of the budget for public decrease. Less money = less jobs to support.

Also if we are to believe the charters cost per student at 18kish (bit too low imo) vs 28k+ for the reg public, they are more cost efficient

1

Evening_Presence_927 t1_j9mb7ek wrote

Except they aren’t shown to do any better than public schools, so it’s not more efficient.

2

KaiDaiz t1_j9mc8em wrote

If we compare charter to unscreened public schools, charters will have them beat and possibly beat the screened publics in near future due to how weak the incoming classes now are due to admission changes.

Charter vs unscreen local are better comparison bc that's what's really available right now in disadvantage communities.

We already seeing more students flock to charters especially the asian demographics due to screened school admission changes.

0

Evening_Presence_927 t1_j9mda67 wrote

Lmao not even close to being true.

Those poor Asian students are going to get scammed

1