hak8or t1_j7l4g5b wrote
Reply to comment by williamwchuang in MTA spent twice as much on Second Ave subway consultants as it did on its construction by NYY657545
I think the issue here is what is defined as corruption.
I instead would favor, on a federal level, an agency created solely to find inefficiencies in our government on a micro scale (not macro).
Make their department be funded by a minimum of a few hundred million a year, give them a huge swath of authority to levy fines on an individual person basis rather than agency/department basis, and let them keep 10% of all fines given, one third of which gets contributed to their employers pension funds, one third to the agency itself, and one third given to all tax payers via a seperate line item on their tax return, so the agency is very visible to everyone.
And when they find actual corruption, give them a mini DOJ so they can throw actual criminal charges at individuals themselves, rather than wait for the DOJ.
And lastly, the agency would only receive oversight from a very constrained group of people, be it the president himself, or the Supreme Court justices, or similar, meaning don't let congress touch it.
williamwchuang t1_j7l8bhk wrote
I'm sure that even if we stick to "violation of existing laws" we will still root out a lot of corruption. The MTA hasn't even gotten all their workers using time clocks.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments