Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

IndyMLVC t1_j6x13hh wrote

−6

brownredgreen t1_j6xpih9 wrote

No, it is not.

6

IndyMLVC t1_j6xrw9z wrote

How so?

−4

brownredgreen t1_j6xsfij wrote

It is not important.

In fact, its a poor attempt at defending Santos, when he is CLEARLY a shady, lying fuckhead.

The $199.99 amount is FAR more important to understand than the total amount spent.

Yes, lots of food for lots of people can add up to big numbers.

No, $199.99 charges REPEATEDLY are not a coincidence.

4

IndyMLVC t1_j6xsit3 wrote

I never said he wasn't an asshole. I never said he wasn't a liar. Context, however, is important

−2

brownredgreen t1_j6xst05 wrote

The comment provided no context, merely an asinine theory that ignores the most damning part of the evidence against him: the precise dollar amount paid.

4

IndyMLVC t1_j6xt7cr wrote

If OP's info is inaccurate, ok. I didn't read the article.

I have zero faith in our government or that Republicans will ever be held to any sort of standard.

−1