Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

El_Gato t1_j6wwgaa wrote

Reply to comment by Rottimer in George Santos' campaign spent more than $26,000 at an Italian restaurant in Queens. That's enough to buy 1,131 orders of the rigatoni bolognese. by MrKleen10

ha! look at the source. Chatgpt can only spit out so much shit content. It's actually pretty impressive that this rag consistently winds up on the front page.

101

grantrules t1_j6x6pw4 wrote

> It's actually pretty impressive that this rag consistently winds up on the front page.

Haha. I didn't read the article and didn't know what the source was.. I read your comment and immediately said "Business Insider"

36

anonyuser415 t1_j6x72ko wrote

AKA 1/3 of all posts to the cess pool that is r/politics

20

El_Gato t1_j6xm4q6 wrote

They must have a $ deal with reddit. It's such horrible content. It's the only thing that makes sense

10

gcotw t1_j6xuuuh wrote

Redditors think Twitter is a good source too, it's a pretty good example of lack of critical thinking

8

frogvscrab t1_j6xlcal wrote

> Chatgpt can only spit out so much shit content.

This is really just silly. This article could have been written in 10 minutes by an actual human being. Its not some lengthy or complex thing to do that would require them to use an AI.

5

travelingforce t1_j6x7gnv wrote

And where in the article does it say this is from Chatgpt?

−8

kimolas t1_j6xfrjk wrote

Business Insider started as a low quality clickbait social media site (think early era buzzfeed), but it pretends to be reputable.

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that most of its content now is being posted with zero oversight from an actual journalist or writer.

12

travelingforce t1_j6xhg1z wrote

Sure, but saying it's written by an AI is just spreading the misinformation the poster was complaining about.

10

columbo928s4 t1_j6yg7py wrote

they do some decent journalism, u just have to follow specific writers

2