Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Langstarr t1_j4zr7yw wrote

For Americans -- your state may have Dram Shop laws, which are the same as this Canadian fellow has outlined. I used to bartend in NYC and it was my legal responsibility to cut people off and I could and would be held liable in an overserving situation like this.

132

Aldous_Hoaxley t1_j4zxjv7 wrote

That's how I learned to order Tito's instead of Dripping Springs vodka in bars. Trying to pronounce the latter after a few drinks would get me cut off immediately.

74

JonnySnowflake t1_j501jah wrote

Same idea, but I switched to Pall Malls in college because I couldn't pronounce "Marlboro" after walking through the cold to get to the gas station

15

LovsickPrfectaTerain t1_j502ymq wrote

I never tried. Even if you called me marbleblows they'd sell em. I always called em Marlbros and they still sold em.

9

MonsieurReynard t1_j522xxo wrote

The new fun is American spirits. They come in like 24 varieties distinguished by slightly different colored packs. And no one knows the proper name, everyone just says the color. So it's "American Spirit Blue" or "American Spirit yellow." But with so many there are like four shades of blue and four shades of yellow now. And around me the gas stations are mostly staffed by people whose first language is Urdu or Bengali (perfectly nice people, they just don't necessarily know every English color term) and so you get into a whole thing of "American spirit gold, no the darker yellow, no that's like mustard, the GOLD, yeah no, the next one, good now up one row, yeah those." I imagine it would be challenging if you were drunk.

11

LovsickPrfectaTerain t1_j54qt1m wrote

Yep. Can't advertise by flavor, no lights or ultralights anymore, especially menthols.

1

MonsieurReynard t1_j522akx wrote

I could see "Tito's" going wrong in amusing ways too.

Me I like Tennessee whiskey and bug spray, but it's a beast to order "Jack n Off" when I'm wasted.

9

rct1 t1_j527exp wrote

Filing that for the next fishing trip. Cheers

3

Thunderhorse74 t1_j51vvv8 wrote

This redditor does local Texas vodka...

2

MonsieurReynard t1_j5231wr wrote

You can buy Tito's around me in rural Massachusetts. It's been a national brand for a while now.

ETA I just checked and they now have a ten story distillery and made 3.8 million cases of Tito's last year!

4

Welpmart t1_j53ac5z wrote

Checking in from rural Mass, can confirm.

1

DFG57 t1_j510r5t wrote

Yep. Also a former bartender here. If I served someone who was obviously drunk I could be held liable for what they did when they left the bar. But I believe there would have to be witnesses that the drunk was falling down or stumbling, slurring, etc. and I served them anyway. There was a regular customer who spent six months in jail after his sixth DUI and the night he got out he stumbled into the bar and asked for a scotch rocks. I told him I wasn't serving him because he was too drunk and he responded "No, it's OK. I quit driving." So he had his priorities all set.

13

Caldren57 t1_j5287ne wrote

I get it, but as a bartender at a concert where there are several bars, it's hard to see who actually gets the drink, a male companion, boyfriend, husband, whomever, buys 2 at a time, at 1 station. Next station 2 more, come back to 1 get 2 more etc... and if there are 3 or more, gimme a break. Wheeeeee.

8

DFG57 t1_j528uum wrote

Agreed. How the hell am I on the hook for someone who is able to pronounce “vodka rocks” then walk away? If I have to lift his head off the bar to ask if he wants another that’s a different story. If this suit collects any money I hope she never sees a penny of it.

6

daschowdertailz t1_j54ggip wrote

If you got an extra 23 bucks look into taking the Oregon Liquor Control Commission (olcc) alcohol permit test. Oregon has the strictest liquor laws in the US. Gotta be a card holder to do bar and gotta take the course and test every 3 years now I believe.

2

keith0211 t1_j51t545 wrote

Generally, though, those laws only allow people injured by the drunk person to sue the venue. In the vast majority of places in the US, the drunk person cannot get damages.

12

BA_calls t1_j530jyc wrote

That seems to be what’s happening. The $15M of damage is probably what she’s been sued for.

1

Rheum42 t1_j51kwqp wrote

I think it's ridiculous that bartenders are held liable for other people's drinking problems

7

Blue_Jays t1_j52u7ul wrote

That would be comparable to casinos being held liable for people losing money due to their gambling addictions and we know that ain't happening!

2