CaveatRumptor t1_j47v2m1 wrote
Reply to comment by ViralViridae in Skeleton of man who dreaded becoming a museum exhibit will finally be removed from display by BadAmateurBirder
If the bodies in those mass graves remained untouched then there was no desecration. Being in a mass grave isn't the kind of abuse Byrne feared. Hunter's disrespect of Byrne's wishes for his own body is quite clear. I just simply asked if Hunter was atheist. I think now, that I've received so many defensive replies, that he could well have been so. Being an atheist doesn't mean one can't be a moral person, but it is no guarantee that one is one either. And it is certainly in my experience likely that atheists will abuse theists. The behaviour of some of the people who responded proves it.
ViralViridae t1_j48177d wrote
> If the bodies in those mass graves remained untouched then there was no desecration.
Weird hill to die on lol. Like sure we’re just going to completely ignore your wishes and the rituals of your religion and throw you in a mass grave like garbage, where maybe they might identify a bone fragment from you. It’s totally not desecration though because some guy on Reddit said so. Like even though you’re Christian, other religions have very explicit death rites, and ignoring those is absolutely desecration to that person and throwing them in a mass grave is dehumanizing on top of it, even if to you the only thing that matters is the integrity of the body
> Being in a mass grave isn’t the kind of abuse Byrne feared. Hunter’s disrespect of Byrne’s wishes for his own body is quite clear.
So? I’m sure some of those buried in the mass grave by Christians did fear that they would be treated like garbage after they died and probably had clear wishes for what they wanted done with their bodies as well. The Christian’s disrespect for those they shoved in mass graves is quite clear.
> I just simply asked if Hunter was atheist. I think now, that I’ve received so many defensive replies, that he could well have been so.
You asked and then when someone asked how that was relevant chose to double down and claim that atheists were more likely to desecrate bodies. That’s not just “asking” so much as your own gross opinion. And so it’s not a defensive reply to call that out as being a a gross opinion not actually based on anything. It’s also funny you think you can draw the conclusion of a historical figures religion based on people arguing against your own dumbass opinion. But critical thinking and religion don’t really get along so no surprise there I guess lol.
> Being an atheist doesn’t mean one can’t be a moral person, but it is no guarantee that one is one either.
Kinda like Christians right? I’ve clearly shown they’re hardly moral, mass graves and all that
> And it is certainly in my experience likely that atheists will abuse theists.
There are religious countries today you can be killed in for being an atheist. There isn’t an atheist country you can be killed in for being Christian or any other religion. Its hilarious you can seriously type that out and think it’s anything close to true.
I’m also pretty sure based on how you write that any abuse you’re receiving from atheists is based on your personality and not religion lol. Or you’re just one of the many Christians with a persecution fetish. 🤷♀️
CaveatRumptor t1_j48277p wrote
I'm sure you've got yourself all convinced about how rightgeous your discourse is. You are assuming way too much about me for which you have no evidence. Your fifteen minutes are up.
ViralViridae t1_j48e9a1 wrote
> You are assuming way too much about me for which you have no evidence.
You provided all the evidence I need to show you’re a bigot when you made baseless accusations against a group you don’t like and then proceeded to keep repeating it while providing no evidence to support it beyond your own opinions. Pretty easy evidence when it’s shit you yourself wrote lol
I’m still waiting for any actual evidence from you about your theories of atheists widely desecrating bodies or being theist haters, or can you just admit that’s your own bigotry?
> Your fifteen minutes are up.
You can leave whenever you want 🤷♀️ god knows I won’t stop you lol
It’s funny you think writing that will stop me responding and calling out how toxic you are.
You can go now though, I won’t bother reading whatever you manage to drool on your keyboard (Haha see I can do it too!)
CaveatRumptor t1_j48f797 wrote
You're ignorant. So ignorant you're not even aware. You think that's your rightgeousness, but it isn't it's just your juvenile vanity. Feel welcome to have the last word. It's above my pay grade here to deal with a numbskull like you.
ViralViridae t1_j48njq8 wrote
> You’re ignorant. So ignorant you’re not even aware.
What happened to my 15 mins being done?
And Yes, that is what the word ignorant means lol. Thanks for defining it twice. You still apparently fail to see how you’re the definition of the pot calling the kettle black. But bigots are normally pretty slow
> You think that’s your rightgeousness, but it isn’t it’s just your juvenile vanity.
Damn dude, why does everything you write sound so neckbeardy? Like you won’t respond to any actual point and then write junk like this to make responding basically pointless. Just insults with no substance but I guess that’s all you really have besides toxic opinions. I’m hardly being righteousness or vain by saying you were being pretty bigoted, which you were.
> Feel welcome to have the last word. It’s above my pay grade here to deal with a numbskull like you.
Cool, I will.
I really should have realized it wasn’t worth commenting further after you showed your true colors saying intentional mass graves weren’t a desecration to the bodies there. Its a great look. Really suits you
Bye 👋
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments