Submitted by tjerome1994 t3_zc4flq in nottheonion
arcxjo t1_iyurrse wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Mass. woman among group suing Sig Sauer, saying gun goes off by itself by tjerome1994
Not saying it isn't possible, but a law-talking guy who's suing them putting out a press release isn't a definitive source any more than all the Facebook ads about Roundup are proof it's carcinogenic.
be-like-water-2022 t1_iyus435 wrote
In 2016, the U.S Army adopted the P320 for use in the field, but not before it underwent significant testing. The Army’s drop test revealed that the gun would discharge on impact at certain angles. Clearly, this was a concern that they needed to have addressed. Sig Sauer met the Army’s requests for a modified trigger mechanism to fix the problem — but implemented the change only for military sales.
[deleted] t1_iyuso9n wrote
[deleted]
arcxjo t1_iyuvtqb wrote
Yeah, but that's from the same press release. You need to cite nonbiased data.
be-like-water-2022 t1_iyuxfug wrote
SubstantialFigment t1_iyurzck wrote
Remington did a recall for this very problem for a long gun. It has happened before.
arcxjo t1_iyuvww1 wrote
That's irrelevant to proving anything about this particular gun unless they used the same parts.
BirdsbirdsBURDS t1_iyuxv4c wrote
It establishes the fact that it can happen. This lawsuit going forward now is stating that it has happened. That’s literally what we’re looking at. It’s not like there’s just this one woman making this random claim against a random gun. She’s one of many making the claim against the same model. Let them figure it out in court now. But saying they don’t have a case because you can’t believe it or significantly doubt it is pointless unless you’re involved in the case.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments