MagnificentBastard0 t1_iy5mxoc wrote
Reply to comment by DSoopy in Former teacher who made 'adult' video in classroom says she was kicked off OnlyFans by WREGnewschannel3
> The problem is not that she had OF the problem is she did a video on a classroom, in a school full of minors.
There were no minors in the school when it was filmed.
“No children were harmed in the making of this video.”
However, the real problem is Puritanism - why can’t this teacher participate in the sexual economy? Why can’t anyone?
EDIT: Several responses have dealt with unprofessionalism, which is not being argued.
It’s the condemnation and overreaction that is problematic.
SomebodyInNevada t1_iy5nvxe wrote
OnlyFans has a rule against content produced in public places since they have no way of knowing if someone might walk in on the scene by accident. Now, she can know she locked the doors but they don't.
SellDonutsAtMyDoor t1_iy5qxx9 wrote
I think the problem is 'why can this teacher film porn in a room used by children soon after and soon before?', and I don't think that's a bad question. I'm not sure what exactly she was doing, but the cleaners at my school didn't wipe down the tabletops half the time.
I'm all for sex work and I know people who have done sex work, but filming stuff like that in an actual classroom is surely just asking for trouble.
ash_274 t1_iy69fp2 wrote
She can rent a studio, she can make some corner of her home look like a classroom, she can green-screen a classroom, or she can apply for a film permit like anyone else that is filming for commercial purposes is supposed to do.
not_a_turnip t1_iy60fc1 wrote
No, the real problem is she was doing it at work like wtf
MagnificentBastard0 t1_iy60yym wrote
Unprofessional, but forgivable.
If she had been using the classroom on the weekend for labeling jars of home preserves to sell, that would also have been unprofessional.
And about as harmful to the space and the children who will be back next week.
As for why, she’s (is/was) a teacher, so getting bus-ay in a classroom plays into a sexual fantasy. Which probably wouldn’t be that attractive if it wasn’t “forbidden fruit”.
So, atrocious or hot depending on your perspective. 😄
rct1 t1_iy8q4dy wrote
If I own an office, and you work there for me, you can use the office to work for me. You cannot use the office to start your own company on the side and run it on the weekends.
It doesn’t matter if it’s preserves or porn, you abused your privilege to try to make money on the side using your employers resource.
ZeroAfro t1_iy7d2hi wrote
Doesn't matter if kids were in school or not. She was removed from onlyfans because ofnthat and her having a onlyfans AND filming in a classroom is a bad look on the school so they fired her.
I don't care about people doing whatever they want. The school has the right to fire her and onlyfans has the right to remove her.
Filming in the school was a dumb fucking idea and there are consequences for for her choice.
She would have been perfectly fine if she kept it hidden from students AND didn't involve the school.
MagnificentBastard0 t1_iyamw9v wrote
I think school teachers should be allowed to marry have an OF. That’s not related to their teaching position.
Filming in the school is unprofessional and if the school’s panties are bunched they of course can fire her. But I assume they can also fire her for anything.
If it was your school to run you could also overreact as much as you see fit.
The tempest is still firmly in the teapot.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments