Submitted by WREGnewschannel3 t3_z0eowe in nottheonion
TBoneBaggetteBaggins t1_ix5oj26 wrote
Reply to comment by imitation_crab_meat in Jack Daniel’s asks Supreme Court to hear dog toy dispute. Will they bite? by WREGnewschannel3
How about under trademark law?
imitation_crab_meat t1_ix5w8qf wrote
>To constitute trademark parody, there must be two juxtaposing messages: the use must copy enough of the mark for people to recognize the targeted brand, but differentiate it sufficiently using some articulable elements of satire, ridicule, joking or amusement so that people can tell it is not connected to the original
Also allowed, and this certainly qualifies.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments