Comments
Jack-Campin t1_ix0z8di wrote
Remember "fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity"? Well this time it's with a really big strapon.
thatthingicn t1_ix11ac1 wrote
Korea is not in nato
Bungo_pls t1_ix12u5r wrote
OK fine but it has a close relationship with NATO and is a US ally which essentially affords them the bulk of the benefits either way.
DylPickle69 t1_ix1ymnx wrote
Wake up bro.
SomebodyInNevada t1_ix22rib wrote
And how is this supposed to work? You can't trust them to abide by an agreement to denuclearize.
Bungo_pls t1_ix26jv0 wrote
I'm sorry Reddit doesn't have an elementary grasp of geopolitics. You'd think Ukraine would've shown everyone how this works but evidently not.
DylPickle69 t1_ix295ty wrote
Oof, I don’t live in Reddit sorry.
Please seek help 🙏
Bungo_pls t1_ix29b0a wrote
Oookay? You're weird.
DylPickle69 t1_ix29ddt wrote
A_MildInconvenience t1_ix2pvu8 wrote
Read the article, not just the headline. It explains what the thought process behind it is
Lachainone OP t1_ix2uwrv wrote
Yes, I agree with you. If having nukes on both sides would help denuclearization, then Russia and the US wouldn't be the ones with the biggest reserves.
SomebodyInNevada t1_ix46t0l wrote
Russia seems to have kept to their agreements with us until Putin came along. North Korea has never kept their agreements.
Bungo_pls t1_ix0mngq wrote
It doesn't though. All it needs is to maintain
membershipA CLOSE RELATIONSHIP WITH NATO and an alliance with the US.