Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

koavf OP t1_iwf0gz2 wrote

Someone else already posted this. How is this supposed to lead to meaningful conversation?

−4

samuelgato t1_iwfal0w wrote

Um, what kind of meaningful conversation were you hoping to find here?

4

koavf OP t1_iwg2cdx wrote

You answered a question with a question. If you're going to respond with a joke, at least an original one that isn't just quoting a piece of media would be nice. How is Reddit better for having these kinds of comments repeatedly?

−1

Mirrorsponge t1_iwf6oee wrote

How do you define meaningful? Who with and about what are you hoping to discuss? If you take nothing else from the comment, take a recommendation to watch Avatar: The Last Airbender.

3

koavf OP t1_iwg2eqk wrote

If you're going to respond with a joke, at least an original one that isn't just quoting a piece of media would be nice. How is Reddit better for having these kinds of comments repeatedly?

Also, the person didn't recommend the show or even name it: how would I have known that this is a recommendation? It's just the laziest and most unhelpful comment.

0

Mirrorsponge t1_iwgp9pc wrote

If you’re going to post an article why don’t you post one that you wrote? How does it make Reddit better to read a story about rotting cabbages? What about this story makes it appropriate for this sub?

3

koavf OP t1_iwgqnyk wrote

That doesn't answer my questions.

0

Mirrorsponge t1_iwgs4oi wrote

I don’t feel that your questions were asked in good faith. The tone of your writing was judgemental and critical.

3

koavf OP t1_iwgsijz wrote

My questions were asked in good faith.

0

Mirrorsponge t1_iwgzocu wrote

Reddit is “the front page of the internet”. I find it reassuring to see others reference relevant cultural icons that I think will guide the world to a better place.

What about this article suggests it would be satirical if it weren’t real?

2

koavf OP t1_iwh0vum wrote

It is absurd. Not everything that The Onion publishes is satire. Message boards are not better off for a raft of comments that are just quotations of an existing piece of media, especially when someone else has already made the same lazy comment.

1

Mirrorsponge t1_iwh3r1j wrote

Ahh. There’s that bad faith again. This article isn’t even absurd. It’s actually quite substantial. Use better judgement when posting articles to this sub.

2

koavf OP t1_iwh6dsn wrote

What do you think "bad faith" means?

1

Mirrorsponge t1_iwh9rbh wrote

Questions asked in bad faith are not seeking an answer to understand, but rather to critique the answer or the answerer.

2

koavf OP t1_iwh9zlp wrote

That doesn't answer my question. Look at the thread you are in: you called something bad faith that wasn't even a question. The fact that you are paying no attention to the thread itself and blithely writing "bad faith" with no comprehending of what the term means or what is written in the thread is itself bad faith.

1

Mirrorsponge t1_iwhakfp wrote

When you asked “how are they your cabbages” you mean to tell me you genuinely thought they might be mine?

2

koavf OP t1_iwhfgml wrote

>That doesn't answer my question. Look at the thread you are in: you called something bad faith that wasn't even a question. The fact that you are paying no attention to the thread itself and blithely writing "bad faith" with no comprehending of what the term means or what is written in the thread is itself bad faith.

0

Mirrorsponge t1_iwhj41o wrote

I have good faith that those who understand the joke will appreciate it. I hope you find some humor in your day and that we can stop bantering about someone else’s cabbages.

2