Submitted by kwentongskyblue t3_ym32bt in nottheonion
Comments
Mentalfloss1 t1_iv1l578 wrote
Next thing you know trains will be using tracks! It’s a slippery slope.
DrugsArentAlwaysBad t1_iv1ma2q wrote
Lmao I wouldn’t go that far, buddy.
Gotta keep it in the realm of possibilities
_malovern_ t1_iv1o9we wrote
Busted.
NetDork t1_iv1v66x wrote
For slippery slopes you need those cog railways, though.
Mentalfloss1 t1_iv1w80v wrote
Sand can help.
NetDork t1_iv1wyte wrote
I don't like sand. It's rough, it's irritating, and it gets everywhere.
Mentalfloss1 t1_iv1x5em wrote
Yeah, I lived in Florida for a year.
tommyboyblitz t1_iv272ov wrote
wiuld this jist be a mistake? wrong reg reported or glitch in adatabase
Alundra828 t1_iv2cetp wrote
Almost certainly, yes.
The bus was issued a PCN, which is done by automated ANPR cameras. The VRM would've been missing from a whitelist maintained by the council, and clearly it was not updated or deployed to the unit, so a mistake happens.
Usually there is a person in between the issue of a PCN and the actual sending of the PCN, but obviously someone was asleep at the wheel, or budget cuts meant they couldn't personally verify them.
So, the PCN was sent out erroneously.
It's trivial to appeal as well, they'd just need to call up, say it's a bus, and it will probably immediately get cancelled.
BlueFlamme t1_iv2dqh1 wrote
Dogs and cats living together!
ash_274 t1_iv2g0ko wrote
Especially if they lose the appeal
Mitthrawnuruo t1_iv2il2k wrote
All I see is a bus impeding the flow of traffic and creating a hazard.
Nagrommmm t1_iv2xe7c wrote
Man it’s like a 3 paragraph article lamooo
That’s being said, yes it was an error. And yes the Leeds Council has apologize and canceled the ticket
kevinds t1_iv3b0i1 wrote
> All I see is a bus impeding the flow of traffic and creating a hazard.
Of other buses?
Mitthrawnuruo t1_iv3cv65 wrote
And other traffic, yes.
kevinds t1_iv3dfgz wrote
> And other traffic, yes.
Other traffic doesn't use a "bus" lane.
Reinventing_Wheels t1_iv3oxas wrote
Someone wasn't getting paid enough to give a fuck
ramriot t1_iv43gz7 wrote
I don't doubt it.
I got a bus lane fine once (private company OBO council) , the lane started under an unlit railway bridge with an unlit warning sign. There was a prior warning sign further up the road but before the side road I turned into the main road from.
I wrote this all into my reply because no way I'm paying for that.
Ended up needing to write three more times as they kept referring it upwards.
My 3rd letter was supposed to be forwarded by them to the independent adjudicator & on this letter I added a post script to the effect that I will be copying all prior correspondence to the local MP who was collecting reports of such abuses.
Got a reply in under a week, to the effect that "since such considerable time has passed since the original infraction, they would be dropping the infraction".
I still passed on the letters & last I heard the company lost their contract & something like £45,000 in fines were returned.
Hungry_Treacle3376 t1_iv4l0dn wrote
Good on you! Most people will say "oh, they made it right so I'm not going to report them" because they're only thinking about themselves. But you went out of your way to do the right thing and might have helped those people get that money back. I love to see it.
tommyboyblitz t1_iv4lof3 wrote
yea dobt normally bother wirh ad riddled links
SomeoneSomewhere1984 t1_iv5w41g wrote
False. Bus lanes are for local public transit busses. Some cities might allow some other busses to use them, but a travel bus can't just assume the right to such a lane.
After-Trifle-1437 t1_ivjsgtu wrote
Next: "Pedestrian fined for being on the sidewalk"
BigOmet t1_iv1k7dj wrote
Now this is an Oniony title.