Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

TricksterWolf OP t1_iurx87k wrote

Before you think, "aww, that's cute", it's because they're hiding criminal evidence in their fur.

I think we all knew this would be the case.

15

DrewidN t1_iurzclt wrote

But they won't, because they can't be arsed.

6

sanjsrik t1_ius09l8 wrote

Problem is, they're a bunch of assholes and won't.

7

yax51 t1_ius3ypy wrote

Cat: knows who the perpetrator is Also cat: Not going to tell because cats are assholes.

10

AttractivestDuckwing t1_iusy5jf wrote

This has to be one of the worst, overinflated articles I've ever read.

1

Deathisnear24 t1_iuu1xxq wrote

Replying to Cocoyabee (#428,281)

I'm really confused about this story. It says they used compared the DNA of the fur on the jacket and it matched the cat the two had. How does that prove that Beamish killed her? I'd always have 1 or 2 cat hairs on my clothes when I had them.

edit: NVM, saw they were estranged, so presumably not living together, which would mean he transfered the cat fur to her clothes when he murdered her.

1

Venkman_P t1_iuuzixb wrote

cat: The can opener murder weapon is in that drawer.

3

LilG1984 t1_iuw0mva wrote

So Turner & Hooch but with a cat instead ?

2