[deleted] t1_iuf4iv9 wrote
Reply to comment by bright_shiny_objects in Amazon may have to turn to SpaceX for help launching its Starlink rival service by ThisIsGooseV2
I think we should figure out how to not fill space with a bunch of trash (aw hell, let’s include not adding more trash to earth, too) before we continue to send things/people into the universe to explore.
bright_shiny_objects t1_iuf5cxt wrote
Hard disagree. You should look up all the stuff they research on the ISS. Also there’s a lot of “junk” that helps us here on the ground.
[deleted] t1_iuf730p wrote
Lol, I’m not against scientific exploration and advancement. I’m against pollution. But it’s fine to disagree… my opinion is my own, and yours is yours.
Alarming_Orchid t1_iufvjgi wrote
Yeah, if you’re against pollution, you should really look up what they research on the ISS.
Alarming_Orchid t1_iug9v72 wrote
I know what space debris means, thank you
Nokneemouse t1_iuf6xw8 wrote
Oh good god. Starlink is a very worthwhile service to have
[deleted] t1_iug8ffc wrote
Never said it wasn’t.
spider-bro t1_iugaxnl wrote
Well everything we do causes pollution so the more valuable something is the less reasonable it is to target it with pollution complaints.
The only way to stop pollution entirely is to self destruct our civilization. So barring that it’s all about which endeavors are worth the pollution.
Deyln t1_iufvev5 wrote
One space satellite is probably mor3xenvironmentally friendly then many many miles of wired telecommunications.
MJ9o7 t1_iugfsvz wrote
Never seen a turtle choke on a soviet rocket booster
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments