Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

xplnLkImFkdInThHead t1_jdxs4bt wrote

Sounds like we need to end protection for the press when they are in an active warzone. Hope active combatants target them like anyone else. They clearly think they’re above the rest of us, let them dodge a few bullets in the name of their trade.

−39

twcau t1_jdy93j8 wrote

Belongs more in r/LeopardsAteMyFace.

17

SilasX t1_jdyiot6 wrote

"Now, now, we're not saying you people have to reveal your reporters' names ... we're saying you're not people."

(Apologies to South Park freak show episode.)

55

Msfracture t1_jdyqces wrote

If journalists can name people, than journalists can be named too.. that's how Human Rights works.

10

[deleted] t1_jdyu716 wrote

It's ok, this just means that the company has declared that it is an accessory to the hacking and must be held either equally accountable or considered to be the architect of the actions. That's probably exactly what those reporters will say if questioned, hence the company "defending their human rights".

They're withholding the names of the witnesses lmao! Time to short the shares..

21

OneHundredEighty180 t1_je36mph wrote

Not The Daily Mail!

I just read a piece by them last night about the fear of kids "from the Home Counties" speaking like Ali G.

Granted, I read the whole article in the voices of Spitting Image characters, but that only made it just bearable.

woof woof! sausages...

2