Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

oxbloodoi999 t1_jd0c2gd wrote

Reply to comment by ChuckFeathers in New trans-exclusionary "Lesbian Project" accidentally uses trans couple’s image by SqueakSquawk4

It's an astroterfed 4chan phrase from years ago to try and frame LGBT as potentially more accepting of pedos.

128

[deleted] t1_jd0sfny wrote

[deleted]

35

Rosebunse t1_jd0c92i wrote

I found an old book from the 70s that used this sort of language. It was weird.

23

Schneetmacher t1_jd1947b wrote

The 70s were... a very strange time. Basically, after decades of negative Freudian influence on sex, people just sort of went nuts and did a lot of crazy shit - including treating adolescents like they were adults.

15

ChuckFeathers t1_jd0ctmi wrote

Right I get that, just a bit shocked that a group supposedly representing 1 letter from LGBTQ+ would paint another entire letter with that brush.

13

bouchert t1_jd0u6r7 wrote

This is a fundamental problem that arises with intersectionality. A lot of oppressed people turn against each other over minor differences, out of distrust, jealousy, or I don't know what.

36

Astrium6 t1_jd21ger wrote

I think it’s just an innate human desire to not be at the bottom of the pecking order. You just need someone, anyone to look down on so you’re not completely at the bottom.

10

absolute_gimboid t1_jd21og6 wrote

You might be conservative, most people don’t think they need to shit on someone below them, that’s you.

−6

nightraindream t1_jd27k56 wrote

I'm pretty sure they're talking about the self-esteem hypothesis of social identity theory.

14

absolute_gimboid t1_jd3rmto wrote

The way it was phrased it sounded as if it was their personal belief and worldview.

2

nightraindream t1_jd5duup wrote

I mean they probably are, but it's also an existing hypothesis in social psychology. Makes their opinion a little more valid than them just being a 'conservative'.

1

absolute_gimboid t1_jd5ebt7 wrote

Considering this hypothesis encompasses the Conservative hierarchical worldview, it doesn't seem like much a of stretch of the imagination to me. I never took Sociology so hopefully I can be forgiven for not being able to identify this theory on it's face.

0

nightraindream t1_jd5gk3d wrote

Yikes, my friend. Just because someone makes an observation on intergroup dynamics doesn't make them lean one way or another. In-group bias is also well documented with you currently, and very ironically, showing out-group negativity.

Fwiw, I doubt conservatives are wondering why marginalised groups end up attacking each other rather than uniting for a common goal.

0

absolute_gimboid t1_jd5km1k wrote

Shame on me for taking someone's words in the first person as meaning what they think. And of course Conservatives don't wonder, it's what they do to every out-group.

0

nightraindream t1_jd5vhkn wrote

Look if you want to play the victim here you're more than welcome. I genuinely don't care, have a nice day.

0

absolute_gimboid t1_jd5ypup wrote

I never asked for your continued opinion, you gave it. You cared enough to try and give me a hard time with it so please do go fuck yourself.

0

karstadtt t1_jd2s67d wrote

Yes, it is so pathetic of those lesbians to exclude transsexuals, so pitiful! They really only have jealousy in mind and it has absolutely nothing to do with transsexuals occupying gay dating apps and hitting on women pretending to be lesbians, while still having functional dick and balls, or participating/dominating in womens sports (check out how many lesbians are in the average soccer team), including unwanted body contact.

−6

No_Assignment_5742 t1_jd3krcj wrote

Why do you think the government is doing everything they can to divide us???? It makes it easier for them to control us, take away our rights, etc etc, without anyone pushing back.... because everyone's too busy fighting themselves......once people wake up to this....the better.....

4

[deleted] t1_jd237kg wrote

[deleted]

−1

nightraindream t1_jd2988z wrote

Are you American by some chance? I would be careful of indirectly dismissing the work of Una Marson, Jayaben Desai, Olive Morris, etc. Just because they were more activism than academic.

The US had all that you wrote and is also transphobic. Pointing to feminism as the reason the UK is transphobic... feels wrong.

4

[deleted] t1_jd2l69d wrote

[deleted]

−4

bouchert t1_jd2sg9z wrote

Really? Kathleen Stock, Julie Bindel, and Martina Navratilova all straight? That'll come as a surprise to them.

3

7HauntedDays t1_jd1ypft wrote

Ummm a TON of lesbians and gays don’t even consider themselves apart of the rainbow soup thing….cuz well as they say, it’s very cult like and demands TOTAL obedience to all and any beliefs they hold. As they also say….their sexual preference doesn’t define their entire existence….🤷🏼‍♀️ You’re gonna see more and more of that I’m sure.

−14

dsxy t1_jd24n88 wrote

No it doesn't.

Some people are just trash and they are in every race/gender/religion/profession.

8

ammonium_bot t1_jd2ofqw wrote

> themselves apart of the

Did you mean to say "a part of"?
Explanation: "apart" is an adverb meaning separately, while "a part" is a noun meaning a portion.
Total mistakes found: 4264
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot ^^that ^^corrects ^^grammar/spelling ^^mistakes. ^^PM ^^me ^^if ^^I'm ^^wrong ^^or ^^if ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^suggestions.
^^Github

0