Submitted by halxp01 t3_11wg1oh in nottheonion
gofatwya t1_jcxrz9j wrote
"Egg prices have surged, fueled by short supply caused by the deadly avian flu, high production costs and egg producers increasing their own profits "
Dicks.
wascilly_wabbit t1_jcxtznu wrote
> Dicks
That's not where eggs come from
GetlostMaps t1_jcy5zrm wrote
Ducks
gofatwya t1_jcywgut wrote
Have you seen the price of duck eggs?
Tru-Queer t1_jcyzj29 wrote
May I offer you a nice egg in these trying times?
Jed1M1ndTr1ck t1_jd0hr08 wrote
vomits red blood capsule liquid all over backseat of limousine
SponConSerdTent t1_jd0jfhx wrote
"Hey that wasn't an egg... that was a dick!"
GetlostMaps t1_jcz4b1h wrote
I have my own ducks.
Burninator05 t1_jcxuok1 wrote
Cloacas.
HowBoutaLittlePiss t1_jcxy9a2 wrote
This sounds worse anyways. Ima start calling people cloacas
trollsmurf t1_jcxztat wrote
I call everyone koalas, because I can't bear them.
ironroad18 t1_jd1vhlv wrote
The cloaca, a hole for all seasons and reasons
shruggedbeware t1_jd256r6 wrote
Oh, sure, let me just spend like 15 minutes trying to break some snake eggs over a counter
DigitalDeath12 t1_jcxyacx wrote
Not for those with chickens at home! The rest of us have to get our eggs from dicks who jack the prices up for profit.
[deleted] t1_jcy0fgg wrote
[deleted]
SilasX t1_jcy6i66 wrote
I don't like appealing to "want to increase profits" as an explanation for price increases. They are always wanting to increase their profits, so it doesn't help explain any particular price surge.
Generally what stops arbitrary price increases is the fact that it draws competitors into the market. So if you see them succeeding in increasing profits, it's because said competitors can't or won't, and if they can't, then that's rightly called a legit supply shock.
Now, if there were actual cartel schemes to hold supply down (the "won't" branch), that would be a valid explanation for malevolent price increases, but even then, that mechanism should be what you're appealing to, not "lol greed".
Edit: Economically ignorant people in this thread, don't bother.
RSomnambulist t1_jcy84l5 wrote
This hasn't been true since the pandemic. The supply crunches have been used to obfuscate margin increases as a test to see what the market will allow before they react. We've proven that we'll keep buying and throw nearly all the blame at inflation and supply chain regardless of it often being the smallest part of a particular items inflation. This is true of most food stuffs increases to prices.
SilasX t1_jcy8o4i wrote
Like I said, that doesn't work generally because of competition. If you have actual concrete evidence of cartelization, then you can cite the evidence of that.
RSomnambulist t1_jcy93by wrote
Cargill and Tyson for one. Both companies are keeping chicken prices artificially high and reaping huge margins.
SilasX t1_jcy97t6 wrote
That's not evidence of cartelization. Again, what changed so that they couldn't or wouldn't do this in 2018, or 2009, or ...?
halpmeplz94 t1_jcyspx2 wrote
Public Sentiment you absolute dolt.
[deleted] t1_jcyqzfn wrote
[deleted]
SilasX t1_jcyr8rs wrote
That's the same thread, and didn't answer the question there either.
Edit: lol blocked for applying basic economics. You guys sure are thin-skinned.
[deleted] t1_jcyrf8u wrote
[deleted]
SilasX t1_jcyrrta wrote
What changed in terms of cartelization. "The pandemic is what changed" is consistent with the (more probable) supply shock explanation. Again, why not do it in e.g. 2009 when they could have "obfuscated" it with swine flu?
Again, they're always greedy. Why isn't competition restraining it this time?
gofatwya t1_jcyw4i0 wrote
Not everyone who disagrees with you is ignorant.
They just have different opinions, buddy.
Get over yourself.
Rosebunse t1_jcysd7t wrote
If supply problems are a thing, stores just don't get the product.
420everytime t1_jczcec2 wrote
Supply and demand means that when when supply goes down you need to lower demand some way to stay in stock.
Most places raise prices to stay in stock. My local Lidl has eggs for like $2.70, but they limit 4 dozen per customer to lower demand
gofatwya t1_jczcobi wrote
That seems a better way than simply jacking up your prices and reaping the windfall profit.
metametapraxis t1_jd217f1 wrote
They aren't doing it to be nice. They are doing it so they continue to have people come in for eggs (with some confidence of supply) and then stay to buy other stuff as well.
Ottawa_man t1_jd0dp4l wrote
Why did the production costs increase ?
gofatwya t1_jd0frrg wrote
The price of feed, rising wages, all kinds of overhead I'm sure; including the price of egg cartons.
Inconceivable-2020 t1_jd4p3rd wrote
Except that there really have not been that many reported Avian Flu culls. It's pretty much all price gouging. In fact in my town we have two regional grocery store chains, one has been lowering prices steadily and the other refuses. The same Dozen Jumbo Eggs are $4.49 at one and $7.49 at the other. A year ago they were $2.99
[deleted] t1_jcy6d39 wrote
[deleted]
caffelightning t1_jczjkyx wrote
>Your friendly reminder that publicly traded companies are legally required to pursue profits at the expense of consumer experiences
*Citation Needed
I'll save you the time: no they are not.
I'll go a step further and provide a citation from a supreme court ruling:
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/13-354.html
BURWELL, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL. v. HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC., ET AL.(2014)
No. 13-354
>Modern corporate law does not require for-profit corporations to pursue profit at the expense of everything else, and many do not.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments