Submitted by Errorboros t3_11p7g80 in nottheonion
pickyourpants t1_jbzaaza wrote
Their definition of impartial makes no sense. Legislation is passed by whichever party or coalition is in power. Criticizing a piece of legislation will, therefore, always be a criticism of whoever was in power when it was passed. To remain impartial, according to the BBC’s definition means never criticizing legislation. Which means the BBC cannot hold politicians accountable for poor decisions.
Impartial means looking at the impact of the legislation rather than commenting on who wrote it. As far as I can see, that’s what Lineker did in his tweet.
Supermichael777 t1_jbzdzw0 wrote
We have a winner.
Darzok t1_jc1wlgq wrote
No it means you have to show both sides you can not just call it shit as that is not been impartial that is just been bias since you disagree with it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments