Submitted by SelectiveSanity t3_11fmvle in nottheonion
GetlostMaps t1_jalhgqj wrote
Reply to comment by fodahmania in Greta Thunberg has joined a protest against wind farms. Here’s why. by SelectiveSanity
These do not demonstrate that they don't get used. to it. Did you even read what you copypasta'd?
When I asked for citations, implicit to that was that they be studies which demonstrated your point - not random citations for studies which do not demonstrate your point. I apologise. It didn't occur to me that you would fail to understand that the studies needed to agree with, support or demonstrate your point and not be tangentially related but irrelevant. Given you missed the point entirely, I won't bother reading your irrelevant copy pasta. I overestimated you. I'm sorry.
fodahmania t1_jallf3e wrote
It is funny that you specifically demanded citations and then try to make me appear lazy by saying that I just copypasta’d. What did you want me to do, write a little dissertation for you? Anyway: ”We also consider the relevance of spatial and TEMPORAL scales and data collection methods when evaluating the results of these studies.”, this in itself implies that the reindeer don’t ”get used to it”. If you wanted to know more, i included a link in which you’ll find the following information:
”Avoidance of an area with good pasture will evidently result in either increased animal density in alternative areas or use of areas that are otherwise abandoned and presumably of less good quality. Even if reindeer have access to seemingly (to the human eye) high quality pasture, there are large variations in nutritional quality between different plants and plant parts. White (1983) has elegantly illustrated the multiplier effect of the animals’ ability to select highly digestible forage. Using an example associated with reindeer grazing, the author demonstrates how a small increase in plant digestibility (14 %), more than doubles the projected body weight gain. High animal density, restricted availability of edible plants or a smaller portion of plants with high nutritive quality will ultimately impair animal nutrition and negatively affect future survival and reproduction.
During periods of nutritional stress, animals will be especially sensitive to disturbance. As described in Vistnes and Nellemann (2001), and Skarin et al. (2008, 2013), the calving period is a time when female reindeer are particularly sensitive to disturbance. The energy demand associated with lactation is high, and the growth of new vegetation has just started (White 1992). Any disturbance that prevents the female from using the available pasture will thus be detrimental. ”
And
”However, to date, there is little proof of increased tolerance among wild reindeer at the regional scale (Vistnes and Nellemann 2008). For example, wild reindeer in Norway were shown to avoid 10 alpine ski resorts during a 20-year period and did not come back to these areas until ski trails and associated cabins were removed (Nellemann et al. 2010). ”
These are from this study: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00300-014-1499-5
riktigtmaxat t1_jaln037 wrote
I'm kind of surprised at the the findings in the last paragraph since in Sweden it's very common to see reindeer in the middle of big ski resorts like Åre.
In Vemdalen they even barricade the town during summer to keep the reindeer out. https://www.instagram.com/p/B0I5CTDoVjW/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
But then again we don't hunt reindeer.
[deleted] t1_jalmlhf wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments