Submitted by Elsa87 t3_11ao0o7 in nottheonion
StarksFTW t1_j9u1toz wrote
Reply to comment by xu235 in Face of man banned from every women's toilets in UK by Elsa87
This isn’t the Middle Ages. Voyeurism isn’t rape, it’s gross and fucked up but they’re not gonna run around and cut peoples hands off for it. Privacy was violated but no physical harm, or contact, was done.
rood_sandstorm t1_j9ujyec wrote
Mental harm is just as damaging.
MoreCarrotsPlz t1_j9uohuw wrote
No dude, just no. The mental harm from being photographed is not “just as damaging” as trauma from a physical assault. Pull your head out.
StarksFTW t1_j9ul89a wrote
And he got a month in prison and several years of parole. The guy is clearly mentally ill and needs professional help. Locking him away for decades would help no one and would only worsen his mental state when he would be released. That sort of punitive punishment is not helpful and is demonstrably harmful to society.
Pudding_Hero t1_j9vyfg8 wrote
Isn’t that just the sort of thinking that got all the Starks killed?
Ma1eficent t1_j9ukqh6 wrote
Mental harm doesn't vanish when there is physical harm also. Its just in addition. And yes, two harms is greater than one.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments