>He's probably expecting Boris to help him back.

Then why didn't Boris pay him back when Russia attacked Ukraine? Seems like that would have been the perfect opportunity to do so? Why, instead, was UK under his leadership one of the strongest supporters of Ukraine in terms of military aid? It makes no sense to support the main enemy of Russia, during the most critical moment imaginable, if he's somehow supposed to be secretly working for Russia. I need you to address this point, if you want to continue laboring this hypothesis that Boris is a Russian asset.