Submitted by TheSausageKing t3_10q04h9 in news
billpalto t1_j6o1lbi wrote
Reply to comment by CoalCrackerKid in N.Y. case against Trump over hush money to porn star goes to grand jury Monday by TheSausageKing
It's on video. When asked about the check to the porn star, Trump claimed he knew nothing about it, and they should ask Cohen. Of course, then Cohen produced the check that had Trump;s signature on it.
alien_from_Europa t1_j6onf80 wrote
Was it under oath or on TV? Because asking Russia for help defeating Hillary live on TV didn't work to bring charges.
Funklestein t1_j6phjrl wrote
The check wasn’t to her though was it? I thought he paid off the Enquirer to buy any story regarding him.
She sold her story to The Enquirer and they decided not to run it as per their deal with Trump.
Considering that he successfully civilly sued her for violating the non-disclosure what is his criminality regarding this?
[deleted] t1_j6oegjx wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6on49j wrote
[removed]
CoalCrackerKid t1_j6o1ww4 wrote
As a lawyer, I suspect, would explain, that's not enough to show intent.
TheManassaBaller t1_j6o7fwd wrote
I think writing a check would show intent.
Art-Zuron t1_j6oeo9p wrote
For any other rube, yeah, but Trump is a demogogue with a cult following. They'd deny it if they literally watched him pay her off on film, had a hot mic, and had his personal confession.
christhomasburns t1_j6ocnp6 wrote
They could argue that he signed blank checks.
CoalCrackerKid t1_j6or0us wrote
If you think so, make the argument. Show what the check pays for.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments