No.

A cult is a group of people centered around a central leader who controls literally every aspect of the followers’ lives in minute detail. If someone belongs to a religion and feels free to, for example, go find a different pastor/teacher/priest to follow, this alone would make it not a cult. If said person can leave the religion without dire personal consequences, it is not a cult. If said person is free to spend money on things unrelated to the religion, it is not a cult.

If it helps, you could say religion is to government as cults are to fascism.

I get that you are an atheist and think religion is stupid. But please understand there are important distinctions to make. And if you think religion is bad, you need to know cults are worse.

It gets used that way but cults are not inherently religions there are plenty of non religious cults like nxivm or est until the 80s or the Manson family. Cults tend to have some relgiosity but the more important thing is to have some sort of figure that gathers people in a way that tends to be both extremely exploitative to then and often destructive to the people involved. Cults often coop a mainstream religion to be the justification for their behaviors even if most followers of the religion would not necessarily condone the actions of the cult.