Submitted by 9lobaldude t3_1090iiy in news
Comments
Fishoe_purr t1_j3vh833 wrote
Was shot several times and taken to hospital with life threatening injuries.
[deleted] t1_j3vkne1 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3vlhe5 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3vq8c8 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3vrz9c wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3vxcza wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3weeuy wrote
[removed]
Indercarnive t1_j3wh9j1 wrote
Almost like knives are less deadly than guns.
JDGumby t1_j3wlnma wrote
Slower, anyways.
arealhumannotabot t1_j3wlutz wrote
Killed, no, but if you read the article you might find the detail youre looking for
arealhumannotabot t1_j3wm1pd wrote
Where did you see that he's Algerian? Not the posted article above, which notes:
> had no identity papers on him
[deleted] t1_j3wr32b wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3ww9iw wrote
[deleted] t1_j3x2ham wrote
[removed]
ImpossibleCompote757 t1_j3xdkwi wrote
So banning guns wouldn’t solve violence?
[deleted] t1_j3xdq4p wrote
[removed]
THEMBISCUIT t1_j3xhhhu wrote
Would make it way less deadly.
[deleted] t1_j3xpdzc wrote
[removed]
M3wlion t1_j3xq9a9 wrote
you ever tried stabbing up a school
pakattak t1_j3y1ztv wrote
I guarantee you if guns were involved that body count would be way higher
[deleted] t1_j3y45wg wrote
[removed]
pakattak t1_j3y50fb wrote
Attempting to minimize death and harm is usually a good governing policy
Shogun_SC2 t1_j3y5kjp wrote
The answer is there is no acceptable body count for any violence you stupid dick, but I guess I’ll actually engage with you and say the answer is 0. Knives make the number closer to 0 than guns do. Show me data otherwise or you’re just another one of these stupid idiots who don’t think before they post and think they are dunking on people when you actually just appear like an unintelligent asshole.
[deleted] t1_j3y6b0v wrote
[removed]
pakattak t1_j3y99xh wrote
If you had someone attacking you would you want them to have a knife or a gun?
[deleted] t1_j3y9qo7 wrote
[removed]
shinobi7 t1_j3yf3me wrote
It would solve violence by gun. You ever been to Japan? No shooting sprees there.
[deleted] t1_j3yi9x0 wrote
[removed]
mx5slol t1_j3yk19y wrote
i love how you have downvotes for what appears to me to be the most logically, not emotionally, supported position
[deleted] t1_j3ykrez wrote
[removed]
Anonymous7056 t1_j3ykt50 wrote
Thank God it wasn't a gun. Be a lot more than six wounded and zero deaths.
pakattak t1_j3ynodk wrote
If we’re talking hypothetically then the knife. Preferably one that I can pull quickly like a switch blade. Guns are too hard to pull on someone rapidly closing distance on you in the case of a completely random attack and while a knife is chaotic, at least I’ll be able to use it at close range.
pakattak t1_j3yo3k4 wrote
This is a completely useless statistic unless you pair it with effectiveness or ratio of victim vs perpetrator.
The argument is knives are harder to commit mass murders with vs a gun. Of course knives will be more popular globally because other countries control access to guns.
[deleted] t1_j3z199q wrote
[removed]
zebtacular t1_j3z6jk8 wrote
Why am I the type of person who reads this title first as “man with knife wounds…” as if he has multiple wounds from being stabbed/slashed with a knife? Are titles getting worse or am screwed?
pakattak t1_j416kvt wrote
Oh man and further, knives are just way more accessible than guns are in general. Every kitchen in a household has a knife. Not everyone owns a gun and yet the fact that it accounts for 41 percent of global violence is not the defense you think it is
[deleted] t1_j4fapxf wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3vgpeo wrote
[removed]