Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Blexcr0id t1_j642cqo wrote

Interesting. Thank you. There must be a better solution out there that is relatively safe and effective, but I guess the chemical companies that produce and sell the existing firefighting foams wouldn't be able to maximize profit for shareholders...

1

PastNectarine5852 t1_j643wwj wrote

They all sell fluorine free foams, so they'd still make money.

Studies at the Naval Research Labs have shown that fluorinated foams just perform better, and for a while, the US govt (particularly DoD) required fluorinated foams. That's changing, but the performance differences have slowed the change to fluorine free versions.

https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/2017249/naval-research-lab-chemists-search-for-pfas-free-firefighting-foam/

3

piecat t1_j67o96q wrote

I don't think I'd mind PFAs being used during, say, war time.

It's the fact that they practice with them all the time.

1