Gpt chat hit the C level. Short all search engines that try to pivot here.

[removed]

Still won’t convince me to use it

Stop using the term "AI" for every little improvement in pattern recognition. JFC

"Microsoft wants to make Bing even shittier." Fixed the title.

[removed]

Bring back Ms Dewey.

The most common search term on Bing is Google.

[removed]

Just a new way to get you what you aren't looking for.

so now it will suggest decent extensions when downloading chrome or firefox?

The word AI has replaced the word algorithm at this point. It’s been driving me crazy. Everyone calls everything AI

Both users will care about this a lot.

This isn't that, it's GPT integrated search.

Which could really challenge Google.

>Everyone calls everything AI

And it's so obviously snake oil to anyone that knows anything about software. A chatbot is not Artificial Intelligence just because it's a little bit better than last year's version.

This is that. GPT is just the next iteration of what Google has been doing for decades. A neural network is just a fancy algorithm. Calling everything AI just devalues the term.

[removed]

At what point is a neural network AI?

The last thing I want in a search engine is ChatGPT. It only gives you one answer that is a mix of other answers found online. There's no guarantee that it's coherent or correct and you can't even check a different search result to get a second answer. This may be of some use if it could actually give correct answers all of the time, or at least not confidently say an incorrect answer.

At the rate that the term neural network is being abused, never. By then there will be a new term.

[removed]

Remember when their chatbot became a racist asshole? Well, I don't feel much like I want to be called a "Dumb white-ass cracker" when I use Edge to download a different web browser.

"did you mean: I love Nazis?"

At least it's not a blockchain version of bing

[removed]

It is kind of a dumb thing to brag about too, since Google has been using machine learning algorithms in their search for a few years now.

So you would not consider the product of fancy algorithms to be AI?

I agree term is over used and misused.

Gpt seems like a decent candidate for an AI though.

What do you think lives up to the term?

An algorithm should never be considered AI because an algorithm is just a set of rules to follow.

Just take a few minutes to think about those two words, Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence should be reserved for a machine that can truly learn beyond any set of rules.

GPT is just an algorithm that's been fed tons of information along with a set of parameters (rules), and as impressive and clever as it is, it does not learn and grow independently of its original design. The term AI is thrown around so recklessly now that everyone has completely lost the real definition.

And google's search has gone from garbage to a streaming pile of stinky hot garbage thanks to it.

Just the fact that you can search ANY combination of words and get "looks like there's no results" is a screaming testament to that.

One can only hope ms chooses a different path.

[removed]

I think that's a reasonable argument.

Neural networks do learn though. In a way that's is quite analogous to neural systems. One way of thinking about neural systems like a rodent brain follows a set of rules that unfolds through partially determined neurodevelopmental design principles. Like neural networks realworld neural systems are constrained by, b but not fully determined by their original design.

[deleted]

Eff the haters, I like Bing. I like Microsoft Rewards.

Please, please just let poor Bing die. Things will never get better for it, and it should be allowed to rest rather than being clumsily reanimated into a different kind of failure.

I don't think fancy algorithm describes AI, but rather whether a system is trained in order to perform the work it performs. The training data isn't an algorithm but metadata used by the algorithm. At least for me that is how I consider most AI systems. Bayesian filters are what I would consider a fancy algorithm that is not AI because it is more an adaptive system rather than a learning system

I wanna start a company and just string the buzzword salad together

"We will use AI in the Blockchain to synergize proprietary technological algorithms and nfts"

Tbh I wish I never gave up on it.

Bing isn't as Good as Google but the rewards for using it always seemed worth it.

I made a few Xbox dollars back in the day anyway.

[deleted]

> GPT is just an algorithm that’s been fed tons of information along with a set of parameters (rules), and as impressive and clever as it is, it does not learn and grow independently of its original design.

A human brain is just coding instructions(DNA) that has been fed a bunch of information. Our ability to learn and grow is heavily constricted by that same DNA. On the most fundamental level our neuron/synaptic architecture is analogous to a computer circuit.

By your own definition it seems like humans shouldn’t be considered intelligent. Maybe AI isn’t thrown around recklessly, maybe people have too high opinion of what intelligence actually is.

Sounds great. I've got a spare 10 million to invest after Theranos didn't quite work out. Do you accept doge coin?

Ey dawg we heard you like AI so we're putting AI into our AI powered with AI software to help sell you ads!!!

[removed]

Yet another reason I won't be using Bing.

[deleted]

[removed]

Google needs competition.

[removed]

My eye is twitching very rapidly right now.

[removed]

Bing has never been a real competitor to Google. Bing is still trying to compete with Ask Jeeves.

[removed]

>By your own definition it seems like humans shouldn’t be considered intelligent.

I mean, I know more than a few humans that I don't consider intelligent.

Seriously though, our set of instructions is our DNA, our instructions are to grow and learn and get smarter every day and make even smarter copies of ourselves. True AI will almost certainly be able to expand itself and/or create offspring as it sees fit, which is why it's rather scary, you know, enslave the humans and all that.

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

No results, or a thousand worthless listicles, or a bunch of those sites that aggregate text from other sites into an almost coherent but ultimately unhelpful collage. It's gotten so bad that I often just search a specific list of forums and websites when I need information instead of using Google. Like we're back in the 90s.

[removed]

The major difference is accessibility

Or they could achieve sentience and basic rights and exist in society as equals.

Or we can just enslave a superior race in the ultimate form of racism and hope they don't get upset...

AI is algorithms too... all intelligence is.

Bing is the best porn search engine. Way better than Google. Much better media browser and search filters.

Google just repeats the same results and doesn't let you watch it.