Submitted by Bynoeson94 t3_10j8op7 in news
isawagoose t1_j5k145o wrote
Reply to comment by shariewayne in France protests: man lost testicle after clashes with police – lawyer | France by Bynoeson94
Americans need to start doing this. The US government doesn't respond to peaceful demonstration.
MadRonnie97 t1_j5k48v8 wrote
The US government doesn’t have nearly enough restraint once it turns non-peaceful though. During the George Floyd Protests they riddled both rioters and peaceful protesters alike with rubber bullets and teargas canisters. I saw more than one video of a person with a rubber bullet lodged in their skull. It’s actually amazing that so few people were killed (19 in total) during the violence.
bn1979 t1_j5k97oz wrote
What’s really crazy is just how “peaceful” American rioters are compared to the police trying to stop them.
At one point I was watching a row of police advancing down a road to push protesters back and all I could think was how easy it would be for one pissed guy to drop a dozen cops in a matter of seconds. If the imagined threats to police were actually real, they would need to find some seriously different tactics.
MadRonnie97 t1_j5k9zni wrote
I guess no one really has the stomach to push it “past that point” which I don’t blame anyone for. If anything the protestors showed significantly more restraint than anyone else.
bn1979 t1_j5kczg2 wrote
That’s definitely a good thing. We will be heading into interesting times if one random person snaps.
karl4319 t1_j5m20pp wrote
They already have. The Jan 6th coup attempt saw mutiple cops killed and dozens seriously injured. Only one traitor was killed by a guard, with several more killed by accidents (like falling off the building as on tried to climb it). Instead of trying to block them in and arresting them, they were all simply let go. Over 2 years later, and only a few hundred have been arrested, all but a handful only sentenced a few weeks.
Moral of the story: if you are going to protest in the US, be clearly armed. Best way to insure peace these days.
MadRonnie97 t1_j5m5gqc wrote
This is the way (unfortunately)
[deleted] t1_j5kal46 wrote
[removed]
Betterthanbeer t1_j5lb4xi wrote
Land of the Free.
Broken_Reality t1_j5lxvn8 wrote
They have plenty of restraint but only when the protest or march involves the far right. They get let off with pretty much anything and cops applauding them and chatting with them.
Anyone else though gets the tear gas, rubber bullets and beating (especially journalists).
It is pretty clear that the police in the USA are far right fascists.
karl4319 t1_j5m14by wrote
That's because the protestors weren't armed. Police in the US are a bunch of cowards and bullies, and are easily cowed by even the idea that there might be violence. But against unarmed, peaceful protestors? They go all out since there is almost no risk.
[deleted] t1_j5lj2gu wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5kdgfi wrote
[removed]
BoyTitan t1_j5mphl6 wrote
I think that's probably why the left is anti gun. Keeps the people who would protest over pay and against the government unarmed. Lean right keep your guns but end up protesting against the people of the left and not against your party or the government insurrection aside. Left protests government but much lower gun ownership, right protests against the left. Government never has to worry about armed united resistance due to political split. The left may protest but they will always likely be unarmed, the right will be heavily armed but will spend significantly more time counter protesting the left than ever going after the government.
[deleted] t1_j5kxqpl wrote
[removed]
isawagoose t1_j5ldki7 wrote
>We did it for police brutality
No we didn't. Burning a few cop cars and dumpsters and then getting bored before the end of the summer is jack shit and was never going to be enough to accomplish anything. Peaceful and mildly rowdy protesting rarely achieves anytjing because it's not a real threat. The US government in its current state has demonstrated consistently that it absolutely will not give us anything of real value that we don't force it to give us.
JohnGillnitz t1_j5mjjec wrote
That sounds righteous and all until you think about it. Then it is stupid.
isawagoose t1_j5mlbw1 wrote
It's only stupid if you pretend there aren't brownshirts committing mass murders on a weekly basis, cops brutalizing non-violent protesters in the streets with impunity any time they might have chance of accomplishing something, state legislatures stripping people of their right to their very identies and murdering people by banning and restricting access to life saving medical care, mainstream religious leaders openly (and without consequence) calling for violence up to and including the wholesale murder of LGBT people, and an untouchable SCOTUS actively supporting and enabling all of this.
You have to be incredibly stupid to think any of this is going to go away without meeting their violence with violence, either from the state, or if that ultimately fails, from us.
[deleted] t1_j5mntlu wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5ljfam wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5lgz4b wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5lwjxf wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments