Submitted by ChocolateTsar t3_znpapk in news
Skellum t1_j0jc0f8 wrote
Reply to comment by mynameisalso in Oregon city drops fight to keep Google water use private by ChocolateTsar
> Wait your take away from that was "golf courses use a lot of water" ?
Yes, I would value IT infastructure far more highly than golf courses. Especially so fucking few, only 29. That's kinda absurd.
[deleted] t1_j0je6om wrote
[removed]
mynameisalso t1_j0jgigm wrote
We all know that golf courses use a stupid/disgusting amount of water. That is why it was used as a comparison.
Your value if IT isn't the issue. This isn't about more or less IT. They could just use a different less wasteful system. But hey they are only one of the most powerful companies in the world so f it I guess.
WhatUp007 t1_j0js4lm wrote
>They could just use a different less wasteful system
Like? Data centers are designed to have as optimal efficiency as possible to reduce costs. I am sure Google would love to reduce that water bill.
mynameisalso t1_j0jsi0b wrote
They care about reducing money spent not water use. Obviously.
WhatUp007 t1_j0jsu13 wrote
Yes? Hence, my whole comment on how if a more efficient, less water usage system existed for data centers, it would've likly been used to save water, thus saving costs.
Figuurzager t1_j0kp2tu wrote
Buying water is most likely cheaper than other forms of cooling. Hence that's why they do it.
[deleted] t1_j0l4t7u wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments