Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

vpi6 t1_j1wqh57 wrote

From that snippet, I don’t think Gorsuch’s objection or arguments to keep title 42 has much to do with Living Constitution theory. I’m also a bit more sympathetic to Gorsuch’s objection here just from a good governance standpoint.

24

FapMeNot_Alt t1_j1x47a4 wrote

His argument is framed from a textualist POV. Looking at the constitution, and law in general, from that framing is troubling for a constructivist such as myself. Not as bad as originalism, but it is still troubling that KBJ signed onto it, and IMO is a message that she will avoid rocking the boat.

I ultimately agree with Gorsuch, don't get me wrong. However, I dislike the avenues he took to arrive at our shared conclusion.

−11