Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Socialistpiggy t1_j2a957j wrote

>The number of people who just say “fuck it” and don’t show up is pretty small.

You still fail to come up with a way to address the underlying problem that bail is trying to address. And I believe you are severely underestimating the amount of people who refuse to show up to court. The system doesn't have to worry about people that have a home, job families or social circles. Those people already show up to court - or generally don't commit crimes at the rates I'm speaking about. We are talking about people who have 15, 20, 25, 30 arrests in the past 10 years.

>Most people will do this. Some people have difficulty doing this for transportation/childcare/job reasons which is a whole other issue and those people would have trouble paying bail anyway. Some people who have a lot of money may skip out - those kind of people should be treated as a flight risk and it may be appropriate to put them on monitored house arrest.

The people we are talking about don't have permanent addresses. They stay with other people, couch surf, frequently evicted, etc. The individuals I'm talking about don't have jobs. They frequently change phone numbers because they are disconnected. These individuals are in and out of jail on new offenses.

6

HanaBothWays t1_j2akdfy wrote

> The system doesn’t have to worry about people that have a home, job families or social circles.

I don’t know what you are thinking in your head but most of the people who get arrested and charged with crimes are in fact normal people with lives, families, friends, and even jobs. People who break the law are not some anomalous breed of human.

Later on in your post you talk about chronic unemployable types who couch-surf and you’re maybe thinking about folks who don’t have stable housing or employment. They really don’t have the resources to flee or hide from the law.

5

Sirlancemehlot t1_j2azzim wrote

>I don’t know what you are thinking in your head but most of the people who get arrested and charged with crimes are in fact normal people with lives, families, friends, and even jobs. People who break the law are not some anomalous breed of human.

Well this just isn't true at all. Its not even close to true. Most people who get arrested have a long history of arrests. How many times have you been arrested? Never? No kidding. The guy who killed the cop in this article:

"The suspect, William Shae McKay, 44, of San Bernardino County, had a long and violent criminal history stretching back to before 2000 that included kidnapping, robbery and multiple arrests for assault with a deadly weapon, including the stabbing of a California Highway Patrol dog, the sheriff said."

Have you ever walked a block in a dangerous neighborhood? Because in a lot of places, 3/4 of the people you pass on the street have criminal records, some of them pages long.

1

HanaBothWays t1_j2b1aeg wrote

> Well this just isn’t true at all. Its not even close to true. Most people who get arrested have a long history of arrests.

I would like to know what your basis for this statement is. Where is the data to back this up?

> How many times have you been arrested? Never?

If that’s the case I am, by definition, not in the category of “most people who have been arrested.”

> The guy who killed the cop in this article:

Hold up there. What relevance does this have to “most people who have been arrested?” How do you know where he falls on the bell curve of people who have been arrested at least once?

> Have you ever walked a block in a dangerous neighborhood?

Have you? Most of those people have families, friends, places where they live, and jobs - even if they also have records.

2