Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

LattewithRum t1_j28uo5t wrote

Reply to comment by HanaBothWays in California deputy killed by driver, suspect dies in shootout by cloud_coder

Bail should be for non violent crimes. Build more prison and jail

−5

HanaBothWays t1_j28vebm wrote

We should not have bail at all, then we just have crimes that people with money can afford.

−2

WirelessBCupSupport t1_j293smd wrote

Bail has its pro and con...but the abuse will always be there.

We have the bail system because: defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Getting rid of bail means authoritarian law and giving up that.

You are innocent till proven guilty.

5

HanaBothWays t1_j294ifo wrote

If we got rid of bail and judges were required to either release people pre-trial because they aren’t a threat/flight risk or keep them detained because they are, we might actually devote resources to ensuring a speedy trial instead of pressuring people to plea out to crimes they didn’t commit or let them buy their way out of detention, which is how it works now.

10

kciuq1 t1_j29kpbb wrote

Bail makes it so that you are guilty until proven rich.

8