Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Exseatsniffer t1_j28veqb wrote

Yep, secret service in jail. That's not going to cost extra hazard pay.

also, if he you think the Trumpets are insane now, wait until he stubs a toe in jail.

−8

GeoLogic23 t1_j28wzxr wrote

You realize they currently have to pay for lodging and travel and shit, right?

Idk what this argument is you're trying to make. There are a million angles you could try, but "it's too expensive to put him in jail" is absolutely not the one I would take.

Definitely a better idea to shift to "it's too divisive to hold him accountable". I still think that's a terribly weak argument, but it's easier to defend than the previous one.

9

Exseatsniffer t1_j2988a1 wrote

Hey, I get it, I want him to rot in jail too, I just don't see it happening for aforementioned reasons. And I get it the reasons given might be bullshit but since when did it mattered if something was bullsjit or not? It hasn't in the last 20 years that's for sure.

0

GeoLogic23 t1_j2992is wrote

Ok but you weren't originally suggesting it as a bullshit reason. You were suggesting it as a logical reason.

You yourself claimed the logistics of keeping him safe in jail would be too costly, and thus we should be ok with house arrest.

4