Submitted by Luka77GOATic t3_zyxapg in news
keznaa t1_j28okic wrote
Reply to comment by SummitCO83 in Australia will not require travellers from China to provide negative Covid test by Luka77GOATic
>If you are frivolous with this it spreads out of control again hints lockdowns hints people losing their shit hints riots. Was that not clear to you?
What are you talking about? if they required international travelers to tests negative before entering the country, then obviously that would help keep the spread of covid down. Which would help avoid needing to lock down again if they can preemptively stop a huge wave from happening there. They had this travel requirement before so it's not a new concept to them.
SummitCO83 t1_j2911v4 wrote
The headline straight up says Australia will NOT require negative tests and I’m saying that’s stupid. What’s the issue here
Bobinct t1_j293uca wrote
Guess I wasn't the only who thought you were against requiring negative test proof.
The first poster seemed to be saying required or not travelers should do it anyway and voluntarily not travel while infected.
SummitCO83 t1_j2948lg wrote
I was responding to the title of the post….
keznaa t1_j2a36oq wrote
>So let’s get back to the stage of forced lockdowns so people can riot and such, sounds like a smart choice jackass. 🤦♂️
Oh okay, you replied to me directly so it sounded like you were disagreeing with what I said and suggesting that if they did travel requirements then that would lead to lockdowns and calling me a jackass. That's why people were downvoting you. If you were replying to the OP, then you should have made that more clear and not posted under a comment but created a stand alone comment instead. So if you read it in the context of it just bring a reply to a comment, you can probably see why people thought that.
SummitCO83 t1_j2a85dn wrote
I now see that, didn’t see it before.
Bobinct t1_j294ltg wrote
I get that, now.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments