Submitted by FINCoffeeDaddy t3_zrh5fp in news
KeepTangoAndFoxtrot t1_j13fr8d wrote
Reply to comment by Then_Campaign7264 in Court ruling: High earners can't prevent media accessing their tax data. by FINCoffeeDaddy
Sounds like attempted(?) tax fraud to me.
tetoffens t1_j13ie45 wrote
The guy put in that he made 133.7 Euros and says he founded a company called 1337 Software, which is stated to have 133,700 shares. I think the guy is just genuinely a moron trying to make an out of date leet joke. Whether it was an inside joke or one he wanted people to catch for self promotion reasons, unsure.
Ameisen t1_j15732q wrote
> out of date leet joke
What do you mean "out of date"?
KnightDuty t1_j158kth wrote
Roflcopters. Facepalm, amirite? epic fail!
If you ask me, he's won the internet. Yes, sir, you CAN haz baconburger.
fmfbrestel t1_j160my3 wrote
You pwnd that dweeb good.
[deleted] t1_j16n33d wrote
[removed]
toastedcrumpets t1_j16jk42 wrote
I member
redpinto74 t1_j17193z wrote
You members
[deleted] t1_j15lus6 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j15ewme wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j15ggy4 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j15vskf wrote
[removed]
SasparillaTango t1_j15wl25 wrote
some things are timeless dammit!
womens_motocross t1_j157t22 wrote
1337 aka leet speak is a form of replacing letter with numbers common on online games in the 2000's
Ameisen t1_j15axbw wrote
Do not cite the 1337 magic to me, witch; I was there when it was written.
Busy-Dig8619 t1_j15e8u8 wrote
Can't spell 1337 Sp3@k l1k3 that f00|.
[deleted] t1_j15mcpi wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j15ar6n wrote
[removed]
Latexi95 t1_j141pd7 wrote
In this case he would have had to pay huge extra taxes if that "typo" wasn't corrected, so clearly not attempt to gain tax benefit.
Usually point of tax fraud is to reduce taxable income, not increase it. ;)
[deleted] t1_j14939r wrote
[removed]
Then_Campaign7264 t1_j13hipe wrote
Brain fart is now a euphemism for tax fraud.
KeepTangoAndFoxtrot t1_j13hs1t wrote
"Oops! I accidentally wrote in fake earnings on my tax documents! Talk about a real whoopsy doodle!"
I'm not even sure why you would do that. Wouldn't this mean that you end up getting taxed more than what you should?
Then_Campaign7264 t1_j13iiga wrote
Perhaps the “fictitious earnings” were an under representation of taxable income.
[deleted] t1_j145tbl wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j151g80 wrote
[removed]
AdventureBum t1_j151plj wrote
I'm not sure I get the logic of claiming you make more than you do, as that would incur a higher tax burden.
[deleted] t1_j1522zk wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j13z12z wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments