Not_n_A-Hole_usually t1_iyjp8yz wrote on December 1, 2022 at 10:10 PM

Reply to comment by Jon-theHuman in UF Quarterback Jalen Kitna accused of possessing child pornography by Cussi2021

I didn’t read this particular article, but I did read another on this incident. The wording used to describe the offending images hinted rather strongly that you’d have to be fairly blind to not recognize that one of the people in the images was most definitely under the age of 18.

Jon-theHuman t1_iyjslv8 wrote on December 1, 2022 at 10:34 PM

And that's what I assume. I'm curious if there is a vetting process for porn sites that advertise using words like teen, young, innocent, etc.

Not_n_A-Hole_usually t1_iyk8bdf wrote on December 2, 2022 at 12:29 AM

Well, a couple years ago there was a big kerfuffle about that in the news concerning PornHub. Apparently some content leaked past whatever moderating system they had in place. In response they simply removed a whole swath of content if there was no way to verify the ages of people in said videos and will not promote or allow uploads of anything they can’t 100% verify as being legal content. I imagine other “major” porn sites likely followed suit.

I can only imagine the amount of money a site like Pornhub pulls in on a monthly basis. Completely reasonable that they’d install a policy moving forward that anything unverifiable is denied a posting.