paperclip_nazi t1_iwlnwi6 wrote
Reply to comment by d36williams in WSJ News Exclusive | Yale Law School Abandons U.S. News Rankings, Citing Flawed Methodology by fransisco_flores
The federalist society and conservatism isn’t the fault of Yale law school.
Chippopotanuse t1_iwmadjs wrote
Not Yale’s fault? Hmmm….let’s walk down memory lane with the Fed Soc to 1982.
- the Fed Soc was founded in 1982 by students at Yale Law School, Harvard Law School, and the University of Chicago Law School.
But these weren’t regular students. They were wholesale propped up by the soon-to-be Yale Dean who was the uncle of one of them.
-
The group's first activity was a three-day symposium titled "A Symposium on Federalism: Legal and Political Ramifications" held at Yale in April 1982.
-
The symposium, which was attended by 200 people, was organized by Steven G. Calabresi, Lee Liberman Otis, and David M. McIntosh. (Speakers included Antonin Scalia, Robert Bork, and Theodore Olson.)
How does a random law student like Calabresi organize all that and get such prominent folks on campus??
Well, for the uninitiated, he wasn’t some random student. He is the nephew of Guido Calabresi, (who would become Dean of the Yale Law School shortly thereafter…those family connections help).
And Steven Calebresi would go on to clerk for Judge Bork and Justice Scalia on SCOTUS. (Isn’t it weird how he kinda waltzes in to such competitive clerkships…clerking for the same folks who he somehow convinced to come to Yale for the Fed Sox’s first event…)
From where I sit, the Fed Soc never gets off the ground if prominent folks at Yale and (Yale itself) didn’t wholesale embrace the bullshit theories that it stands for.
I’m sure you are of the mind that it was an innocent student group that just coincidentally had its genesis at Yale.
To each his own I suppose.
Throwawayhelp111521 t1_iwn6upy wrote
Steven Calabresi is very well-connected, but his uncle, Guido, the former dean of Yale Law School and current federal appellate judge, is not a Federalist Society type.
When Robert Bork was nominated for SCOTUS in 1987, virtually everyone at YLS was against it. There was a very well-attended panel discussion at which his former colleagues spoke. Even the professors who had a friendly relationship with Bork criticized his legal philosophy.
paperclip_nazi t1_iwmlqsn wrote
But what is Yale supposed to do about that? You can’t just ban fed soc
Chippopotanuse t1_iwnuvy0 wrote
Yes…yes you can.
As a private college, Yale can most certainly place a particular set of moral, philosophical, or religious teachings above a commitment to free expression. It has EVERY right to do so.
The freedom to associate voluntarily with others around “common goals or beliefs” is an integral part of a pluralistic and free society.
AND ITS WHAT CONSERVATIVE JUDGES AND THE FED SOC USE TO JUSTIFY EXCLUDING GAYS FROM PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS LIKE THE BOY SCOUTS AND FROM RELIGIOUS COLLEGES.
So, students who want to be a part of the shitty federalist society can fuck right off with their complaints about “free speech” if they get banned from private elite colleges.
Yale ain’t the government. It don’t need to accommodate.
Why is that?
Well…back in 2000, Rehnquist, joined by O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas, authored a 5-4 decision in Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale.
And that case held that the constitutional right to freedom of association allowed the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) to exclude a homosexual person from membership IN SPITE of a state law requiring equal treatment of homosexuals in public accommodations.
More generally, the court ruled that a private organization such as the BSA may exclude a person from membership when "the presence of that person affects in a significant way the group's ability to advocate public or private viewpoints".
surfpenguinz t1_iwoxf03 wrote
This is the most insane, terrifying, and anti-intellectual comment I’ve ever seen on Reddit, and I’ve been here a while.
[deleted] t1_iwtq75w wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments