Dalisca t1_ivg4qoi wrote
Reply to comment by bjplague in Cardinal Ricard among 11 French bishops accused of abuse by motayba
Iirc, the whole point of restricting marriage was to eliminate familial nepotism & inheritance. A wealthy cardinal, for example, would then be forced to leave his estate to the Vatican instead of a wife or children. Likewise, it was supposed to stop titles being granted to the children of clergy.
Neither of these things worked, of course. A blatant example would be Pope Alexander IV, who had children via a mistress and still had the brass to promote his "bastard" to cardinal. The whole story is fucked up. "The Borgias" is a somewhat sensationalized and easy-to-digest version of events.
[deleted] t1_ivgr9it wrote
[removed]
TogepiMain t1_ivkb3uo wrote
So there's still an answer there. You don't need to not have heirs, you just need a better anti nepotism rule... not that they'll follow that either, and it's still probably for the best to just get rid of the thing entirely
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments