Submitted by tearsaresweat t3_z44hkf in news
Vault-71 t1_ixrkjez wrote
Reply to comment by Delicioustoilet in Luring pedophiles through fake online ads is not entrapment, Supreme Court says by tearsaresweat
It likely won't lead to anything significant.
The whole idea behind entrapment is that the accused would not have engaged in the activity without the aid of a law enforcement/government representative.
While advertisements can certainly be convincing to some people, I believe clicking on a CP ad conveys a willingness to engage in the activity without any governmental coercion.
[deleted] t1_iy2cqyo wrote
>I believe clicking on a CP ad conveys a willingness to engage in the activity without any governmental coercion.
Not necessarily. There are plenty of weird shit people click on. Just because I click on r/popping doesn't mean I have a fetish for it. This ruling is dumb and doesn't do anything to solve the underlying issue.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments