Comments
[deleted] t1_iuu93ki wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuu9nt7 wrote
QuestionableNotion t1_iuuahcs wrote
WTF kind of nuttery are you on about?
Dramatic_Original_55 t1_iuuajld wrote
We'll probably find out the guy has a terrible memory.
[deleted] t1_iuuajv4 wrote
[deleted]
aleph32 t1_iuuakeh wrote
He's still gung-ho for Trump. They just want to question him, particularly about his claims that Trump declassified the documents he was caught with. On Monday he said this:
> “I’m all in with the boss, and you know that,” Mr. Patel said. “First, I tell people, let’s win the midterms. And then let’s see what he does and, you know, you and I think I know what he’s going to do.
LakeChaz t1_iuuat2s wrote
Remind me which party worships Putin and which President slobbed on Russia's knob whenever possible.
Franklinisnttortoise t1_iuuaxaw wrote
r/conspiracy user
Don't waste your time arguing with this dumb ass.
[deleted] t1_iuuaxii wrote
Eliju t1_iuub6d6 wrote
He wouldn't be granted immunity if he didn't do something illegal. They don't just hand out immunity. They catch a low level schmuck doing something minor, but illegal enough that he doesn't want to be prosecuted and wind up in jail, they tell him they'll make it go away if he can give them something to take the boss down and then he's granted immunity.
hoosakiwi OP t1_iuub844 wrote
It doesn't sound like there is an immunity agreement. Rather, it sounds as if the prosecutors granted him immunity in order to get a judge to compel him to testify.
He won't be able to claim the 5th anymore (like he did last month), but I don't think it will stop him from saying "I don't recall". Unsure how valuable his testimony will be...
[deleted] t1_iuubc3z wrote
Reddit-username_here t1_iuubie7 wrote
Without having committed a crime, and already willing to spill dirt, he wouldn't have immunity. Shit's about to get interesting!
Yarddogkodabear t1_iuubl48 wrote
If he purgers himself whilst under immunity what happens?
[deleted] t1_iuuciwz wrote
[removed]
ent4rent t1_iuud1zo wrote
If he doesn't spill beans, then he can't claim immunity when prosecutors obtain evidence independently. It's in his best interest to put everything on the table now
Hamwise420 t1_iuud9bx wrote
the immunity is contingent upon him being cooperative and truthful, if they can show he isn't then there is no immunity and they can prosecute for whatever other crime they may have him on.
dasherchan t1_iuue3sp wrote
Time to jail the crook.
vexpopped t1_iuue6ey wrote
He is being given immunity in order to force him to testify without being able to claim the 5th amendment as he did the last time he testified, however they will be able to revoke that immunity if he lies to them and the DOJ already knows the answers.
Rudy_Colludiani t1_iuuf9hi wrote
Hung himself in his cell
Sad!
Low energy!
usedtodreddit t1_iuufcrr wrote
Once given immunity for a Grand Jury, you no longer get to claim the 5th Amendment privilege and it becomes VERY easy to be found guilty of perjury if you aren't entirely truthful because the Grand Jury is going to also be seating any and every other person with knowledge of the same issues and if everyone's story don't match, someone's going to wind up doing time.
The real risk here, I fear, is he might somehow be able to pull a Oliver North and take blame for everything himself now that he can't get in trouble for it. Boy was that ever a shitshow and all it did is provide Reagan with "Plausible Deniability". I F'ing hate those words.
[deleted] t1_iuufrk2 wrote
[removed]
Playos t1_iuufv49 wrote
If there isn't an immunity agreement, then there still isn't anything stopping prosecutors from obtaining evidence independently.
[deleted] t1_iuuh3p2 wrote
blowtheglass t1_iuuhj0e wrote
Everyone's saying it
Cardboard_Connection t1_iuuhyes wrote
Kash Patel is trash and beyond corrupt.
[deleted] t1_iuui4zj wrote
[removed]
mekonsrevenge t1_iuuihec wrote
The guy is a habitual liar. I'm not expecting much. I hope I'm wrong though.
geronimo1958 t1_iuuj3oz wrote
Watch him lie anyway. It is the republican way. Remember Ollie North.
N8CCRG t1_iuulyjt wrote
I'm not sure I understand the difference.
yhwhx t1_iuumij0 wrote
Trump sure does hire some lying scum.
[deleted] t1_iuumjf5 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuumtqg wrote
[removed]
lookslikesausage t1_iuumw2f wrote
:( this is probably correct
[deleted] t1_iuun1kh wrote
[removed]
not_a_droid t1_iuuncva wrote
he was looking tired
PatrickBlackbrn t1_iuunvpg wrote
Do you think he’s testifying against Hillary?
PatrickBlackbrn t1_iuunzbk wrote
Said the guy on Reddit.
Wazula42 t1_iuupwyl wrote
Or he can just hold out until the next GOP president pardons him.
spornerama t1_iuuqsac wrote
he's probably trying to avoid accidentally hanging himself or tripping and falling through an upstairs window before the trial
invent_or_die t1_iuuqzwf wrote
And of course they don't have to tell him what they already know. It's a pretty clever trap.
chadenright t1_iuurjm7 wrote
If the jury gets sufficiently pissed that he 'cannot recall,' they are permitted to jail him indefinitely without trial for contempt of court in order to jog his memory. https://www.techdirt.com/2016/04/28/so-much-fifth-amendment-man-jailed-seven-months-not-turning-over-password/
uzlonewolf t1_iuurwpr wrote
I see you've also seen this movie before.
chadenright t1_iuus84l wrote
The fifth amendment, once upon a time, prevented one from being compelled to incriminate oneself via testimony. However, that hasn't stopped courts from attempting to compel people to incriminate themselves anyhow, and the last-ditch line of defense against that is to simply be unable to remember any of the incriminating evidence you are being compelled to testify about.
If you aren't a big-wig politician with the pull to buy off a judge it generally results in contempt of court.
DeificClusterfuck t1_iuus932 wrote
Kash Patel is a known liar. The Justice Department is aware of this. If he's proven to have lied it will fuck any immunity deal on the table. Whether or not Kash is sufficiently scared of prison to keep that in mind is another matter.
chadenright t1_iuuskxe wrote
He's still a dangerous traitor with a large following, I may get sick of hearing about him but at least I know where the backstabbing piece of dirt is.
VagrantShadow t1_iuuttq1 wrote
He found a window to jump from, he shot himself three times in the back of his head too. He didn't want to live and tell what he knew /s
rchart1010 t1_iuutyzj wrote
Kash Patel is the very worst of the worst and was involved in some of the shadiest shit. IIRC, he likely faked a presidential memo, tried to send it out and then denied having anything to do with it.
Like he is one of those opportunists who literally has zero morals. Such that he was a standout in the trump administration.
No one should believe a single word he says without first verifying it.
rchart1010 t1_iuuu4wm wrote
Almost everyone in the trump administration was corrupt trash. Kash Patel was on an entirely different level.
N8CCRG t1_iuuubzt wrote
That's not the part I found unclear. I meant the difference between "immunity agreement" and "granted immunity".
[deleted] t1_iuuuef9 wrote
[removed]
Federal_Ninja_4637 t1_iuuv7kn wrote
He knows what trump was doing with the stolen documents this really going to hurt trump
[deleted] t1_iuuvndg wrote
[removed]
Kevin_IRL t1_iuuvwya wrote
Off topic but it struck me as kind of funny that one of the few people of color in the last Whitehouse staff has a name that sounds like money
SacrificialPwn t1_iuuwcgz wrote
One is accepted and the other is applied without acceptance?
SacrificialPwn t1_iuuwew1 wrote
And convict him for perjury
Graterof2evils t1_iuuwir9 wrote
Yeah he’s the guy that’s had the information that’s coming out any day now , for the last six years. And just wait. When you hear it it’s going to blow your freaking mind! Don’t forget Hunter.
BowwwwBallll t1_iuuxv5a wrote
Two years is a long time to sit in prison for contempt.
nahteviro t1_iuuy1wp wrote
No. He will be testifying on reality, not some GOP made up fantasy.
BowwwwBallll t1_iuuy5lt wrote
An immunity AGREEMENT can be very broad. The witness can agree that nothing in his testimony can incriminate him, OR that nothing that the government finds out as a result of his testimony can incriminate him. Which is a very nice deal.
Having immunity GRANTED can mean as little as no prosecution for the answers given in response to questioning, BUT, if the answers open an investigation into other illicit dealings independent of the actions about which the witness is questioned, the witness can and will be prosecuted for those.
GhostFish t1_iuuz8no wrote
It's hard to imagine anyone this close to Trump having true loyalty to him.
Generalbuttnaked69 t1_iuuzdbu wrote
Never. Real life isn’t a John Grisham novel.
[deleted] t1_iuuzfx0 wrote
[removed]
Generalbuttnaked69 t1_iuuzlzq wrote
Might have to buy new shoes, especially if he’s been drinking red wine.
Peteman12 t1_iuuzr08 wrote
He fell down an elevator shaft. Onto some bullets.
CapnCrackerz t1_iuv1f7d wrote
Kash Patel is as bonkers as Michael Flynn.
MinTock t1_iuv1gl4 wrote
Or a what does it really matter point. 🤷🏿♂️
PuellaBona t1_iuv4ypp wrote
He tripped and fell his neck into his belt hanging from the ceiling
PuellaBona t1_iuv549r wrote
Agreed, but they're so pretty to say. Plausible deniability.
[deleted] t1_iuvbg7b wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuvd35c wrote
[deleted] t1_iuvhaux wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuvi122 wrote
[removed]
raistlin65 t1_iuvi4ui wrote
>From what I've seen the FBI isn't fucking around or taking big risks on this case.
Yep. And federal prosecutors have a shitload more experience in deciding whether or not somebody can be a reliable witness, than Reddit users. lol
chalkoutlin3 t1_iuvie1i wrote
prolly an “accident” on his way to testify…
chalkoutlin3 t1_iuviffz wrote
he has to testify first….
chalkoutlin3 t1_iuviku8 wrote
trump will use his presidential powers to pardon him…… of course
420ipblood t1_iuvpt3z wrote
Thanks for explaining this! Is water wet?
Cfp0001-Iceman t1_iuvpwut wrote
> I'm assuming they have something more to bring to the table than their own word.
Pretty sure they got video or recorded evidence. Considering how much Trump threatened to release the tapes, I think the tapes were being used against him already.
[deleted] t1_iuvqhc0 wrote
[removed]
CountBeetlejuice t1_iuvr67o wrote
trump isnt president now, so this guy will live to testify, unlike epstein
[deleted] t1_iuvrsab wrote
[removed]
Zolome1977 t1_iuvs4de wrote
Unfortunately the truth. This might bite the prosecution in the ass. You can’t use a piece of crap as a witness.
Anneisabitch t1_iuvtse6 wrote
Nah, he’s judged correctly that the DOJ will wait and wait and wait and wait and finally start out slow and then slowly fade away. 2 years is nothing.
RSquared t1_iuvw60p wrote
Notably, he claimed publicly that Trump had declassified all of the MAL documents, then pled the fifth in deposition when asked about this claim.
[deleted] t1_iuvw6uo wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuvwcux wrote
[removed]
RSquared t1_iuvwiyf wrote
A notable fuckup was a grant of immunity to Oliver North when testifying to Congress about Iran-Contra. He successfully overturned his conviction because the prosecution couldn't show that they absolutely didn't use his public testimony in preparing the ironclad case against him.
Another one is the medic who was supposed to testify against Eddie Gallagher, and was granted immunity, only to claim that he himself did the killing that Gallagher was accused of.
katievspredator t1_iuvwsab wrote
I don't think you know how immunity works. He has to testify or he can get 5 years in jail. If he refuses to answer, he violates the agreement and he gets jail. I don't think he would take this deal if he was prepared to go to jail for the orange menace. I'll trust the DOJ on this one
previouslyonimgur t1_iuvx0f1 wrote
And if he lies and is caught, he goes to jail.
Zolome1977 t1_iuvxdow wrote
I know how immunity works, he is a bad witness to testify. He is a known liar, conman, all which can be used by the defense to paint a picture he is not a trustworthy witness. It doesn’t matter if he is telling the truth, his character is detriment.
QuestionableNotion t1_iuvxvrf wrote
>Kash Patel is a known liar.
Makes sense. He is a Republican who worked in the Trump Administration. Seems to me the fact that he is a liar would be understood based on those two things alone.
katievspredator t1_iuvy1lg wrote
Literally every legal expert commenting on this says otherwise. You don't get deals like this until you're in the end game of an investigation and the investigators know what you know already. They don't offer immunity to find out what you're hiding, they offer immunity because they already know what you did and want the higher ups
The whole team of investigators working on this have specialties in dealing with the mob. They were hired specifically to flip people loyal to a crime boss. I think they know what they're doing
zappy487 t1_iuvy58b wrote
Gets caught j-walking. Believe it or not, also jail.
DocPsychosis t1_iuvybjz wrote
It's a grand jury, there is no defense representation, just the prosecutor presenting evidence.
AshleyNeku t1_iuw057g wrote
"Just the other day a man comes up to me, he's crying, and he asks me...why? Why did Cartman kill himself?"
"Kash."
"Yeah, Johnny Cash too. Very talented, I never knew the man, but I heard he liked birds."
Mr_Tulip t1_iuw0k6b wrote
Trump's gonna Lock Her Up any day now, right champ?
[deleted] t1_iuw0niu wrote
[removed]
AugustHenceforth t1_iuw0o04 wrote
Trump's sole talent is finding utter filth as vile as he is to go along with his bullshit.
He's found at least 74,216,154
[deleted] t1_iuw1cc6 wrote
[removed]
charliedog8 t1_iuw1oel wrote
Trump lawyer: "He's a known liar. That's why Trump hired him." Checkmate. Next witness please....
[deleted] t1_iuw1svs wrote
[deleted]
EffyewMoney t1_iuw2brj wrote
The fact that you have to explain this is why I've written and deleted about 5 comments this morning without ever submitting them.
swissbuttercream9 t1_iuw2kvf wrote
Aakashbhai in trouble
[deleted] t1_iuw4ekh wrote
[deleted] t1_iuw4fpl wrote
[deleted] t1_iuw5a0a wrote
[deleted] t1_iuw5eon wrote
[removed]
Snuggle_Taco t1_iuw5i3s wrote
He is and has been posting EXTREMELY NON SUBTLE calls for violence against "the left".
Praesentius t1_iuw6184 wrote
What if he overcooks fish while testifying?
dlec1 t1_iuw6f0a wrote
Welcome to Putin’s America where people “jump” out of windows
Slutdragonxxxpert t1_iuw6wal wrote
I hate immunity sometimes they get compromised and lie anyway and I know there are conditions but still.
[deleted] t1_iuw7unh wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuw8bdf wrote
[removed]
DevLARP t1_iuw8c2y wrote
More importantly, their comment implies that it’s possible to find a NON-greedy-conman-sociopath in team “grab em by the pussy”?
flipping_birds t1_iuw8tne wrote
The Michael Cohen effect.
slater_san t1_iuw8xlk wrote
Everyone involved is a piece of crap though
flipping_birds t1_iuw8z63 wrote
Not everybody knows everything.
Eli_Renfro t1_iuw90t0 wrote
It's like Superman 3
Roasted_Butt t1_iuw92w3 wrote
also jail
flipping_birds t1_iuw985n wrote
Your first time at the rodeo I see?
CrashB111 t1_iuw9u5t wrote
Always assume the DoJ only asks questions they already know the answer to.
iAmTheHYPE- t1_iuwbrb7 wrote
> Such that he was a standout in the trump administration.
Never heard of him until this year, in contrast to people like Bannon, Stephen Miller, A Shit Pie, Jeff Sessions, Barr, Kushner, etc.
[deleted] t1_iuwbv78 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuwc5rh wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuwc5y6 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuwca4z wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuwcsj0 wrote
[removed]
Zolome1977 t1_iuwcthk wrote
Yes but not all are a brown man. Let us not pretend his skin color will not skew people’s belief in what he says. Yes I’ll get downvoted but meh.
LustThyNeighbor t1_iuwcw5w wrote
That's also a-paddlin' as far as I know but I'm not a lawyer, I only played one in a critically-panned performance at our local community theater.
NotInTheNextCubicle t1_iuwd3d9 wrote
But I...I was told I could listen to the radio at a reasonable volume from 9 to 11.
NancyPelBroski t1_iuwda87 wrote
We would have no witnesses if that were the case.
TurboSalsa t1_iuwdg83 wrote
Trump was already ranting this morning on some Newmax morning show that nobody watches that the system is rigged and the American people won't stand for holding him accountable. I think he knows it's about to go down.
RIP_Mitch_Hedberg t1_iuwdj78 wrote
I’m a free man and haven’t had a conjugal visit in 6 months.
[deleted] t1_iuweu1k wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_iuwf3ho wrote
[removed]
thewaldenpuddle t1_iuwf7qv wrote
I wonder if his immunity extends to perjury when he does testify….. ?
thewaldenpuddle t1_iuwfhds wrote
Misuses an aerosol can? Cuts the label off his mattress?
Oh…. the jeopardy he is truly in….
Zolome1977 t1_iuwg7gb wrote
We are living in a post truth era.
neutron-bob t1_iuwggml wrote
Could he be pardoned by a republican president? Maybe thats his angle.
[deleted] t1_iuwis3a wrote
[removed]
Show_Me_Your_Cubes t1_iuwktw7 wrote
Tell that to Epstein, the russians, etc.....
Show_Me_Your_Cubes t1_iuwkxyw wrote
Nobody. Democracy hinges on holding leaders accountable for their actions, criminal or otherwise.
IWantToBeTheBoshy t1_iuwldp7 wrote
Alan Weiselberg for example.
skaptastic t1_iuwlfbd wrote
this guy doesn’t seem the type to enjoy 730 days of watery meals.
rchart1010 t1_iuwn4dm wrote
Yeah, I only heard about him in books about the end of the trump administration. He was brought in when trump wasn't even trying anymore and was just trying to install loyalists to keep him in power. Kash Patel is an absolute worm.
rchart1010 t1_iuwnuly wrote
Perhaps. I still would make sure to verify everything he had to say and I would assume he is sharing information with the other side and working to destroy evidence if he can.
He, IMO, is just as likely to make up information and publicly release it to "prove" that the justice department did something wrong and hope he can scare and bully them into not having him comply at all.
Even the logic that applies to shitty humans doesn't seem to apply to him.
ImSabbo t1_iuwofql wrote
Wouldn't that be the normal thing to extend immunity to? I admit I don't know a lot about law, but that at least feels right.
thewaldenpuddle t1_iuwoyav wrote
No…… my guess is that the immunity applies to not prosecuting him for admission of any crimes on his part during his testimony. But if he LIES under oath….. then I’m assuming he would still be liable for that.
In this case, he has far less incentive to lie, because he can’t be held accountable for anything he says when he tells the truth….
But for people circulating in the trump world….. lying/breathing…. Same, same….
morpheousmarty t1_iuwp19y wrote
Yeah, that only works for Trumps. The campaign manager, Flynn, Bannon, Stone, the lawyer, all did not see their problems just fade away.
irkli t1_iuwp1hw wrote
No. He cannot lie. His assertions will all be verified. Standard procedure and I doubt shortcuts will be taken in this case.
Lucky-Load2637 t1_iuwpa2m wrote
Oh I absolutely see him trying that. But lying to the DoJ isn't like lying to the press. There are real consequences to it. And there's no way they'll ask him anything they don't already have the answer to.
thewaldenpuddle t1_iuwpgre wrote
Thanks. I assumed…… seems the logical thing…..
but the world is so fucking weird nowadays….. that I just can’t tell anymore….
Morchaint t1_iuwpmqk wrote
Immunity is always contingent on cooperation and honesty. If you fail to meet the terms of the immunity, the immunity is lost. In other words, if he is caught lying he loses his immunity deal.
ImSabbo t1_iuwptif wrote
Ah, I see. That makes sense.
I think I had misremembered the meaning of "perjury" anyway as "admitting to a crime while under oath (aside from the one/s being tried)" rather than "lying under oath". Hopefully I'll remember from here on.
thecatwhatcandrive t1_iuwvork wrote
I've always suspected some foul play
[deleted] t1_iuwvzg8 wrote
[removed]
Reeleted t1_iuwwqqs wrote
Thanks for adding absolutely nothing to the conversation! Good job!
rchart1010 t1_iuwxh9i wrote
He is the type who would just try to take down the DoJ if he got caught lying. There just aren't any scruples, any rules with him. I dont like to throw around diagnoses lightly but I think he is likely a sociopath.
And I'd bet good money that he is working behind the scenes on everything they ask him about to destroy or fabricate evidence. I'm sure the DOJ lawyers are savvy, I just think this guy is a special kind of evil.
wiseoldfox t1_iuwxlnc wrote
I hate this little asshole. Hopefully he will get caught up in other crap headed Florida way.
wiseoldfox t1_iuwyaod wrote
This dipshit was almost made acting CIA director in the waning days. Worked for Nunes.
Reeleted t1_iuwyiwb wrote
That's how you win even if you lose with his cult.
Reeleted t1_iuwz2ti wrote
This is literally a post about him. You come into a post about him, read about him, then cry because you're sick of reading about him. When aaaaallllll along, you could have just downvoted and moved on. Seems crazy to me.
justforthearticles20 t1_iux5egl wrote
Granted immunity. Will now testify that all illegal actions were his doing. Trump to he exonerated by his loyal lapdog Garland.
AgreeableFeed9995 t1_iux6z4h wrote
Wouldn’t that violate the terms of his immunity? The only way he could do that is admitting to falsifying evidence and perjury after the fact. He’d be fucked
rchart1010 t1_iux7lyp wrote
>Wouldn’t that violate the terms of his immunity?
Probably and for an average, normal human you'd consider that jail or imprisonment would be a consequence. I dont think he is the type to think that way. Rather I think he is the type to try to fabricate or destroy evidence, publicly make false statements to undermine DOJ trust and activate the trump crazies to enact some violence in response to whatever lies he makes up..
picasso71 t1_iuxe0oe wrote
Immunity only shields from previous actions, usually limited to the scope of what's being investigated. Lieing under oath would be a future action, and not covered. In fact if the testimony is markedly different from what information was given during the investigation, I think the immunity can be revoked, and actually cause more legal troubles.
VegasKL t1_iuxf0e7 wrote
Sounds like they set a trap for him. He's an idiot if he falls into it, but I like the odds.
If he lies and they have evidence he did, he screws himself. If he took the immunity so he could lie without pleading the fifth instead, he's an idiot.
[deleted] t1_iuxgc1x wrote
[removed]
PatrickBlackbrn t1_iuxgkik wrote
You must be the walls are closing in guy. LOL.
Murgos- t1_iuxonv5 wrote
Literally you don’t offer immunity if you don’t need to.
Graterof2evils t1_iuxovqp wrote
You must be one of the, “Mexico’s gonna pay for the wall!”, guys.
PatrickBlackbrn t1_iuxsg1g wrote
Just a guy who check Reddit to see how wacky progs, socialists, and commies are.
Cli4ordtheBRD t1_iuxxmn9 wrote
Oh for sure. But that doesn't mean he doesn't know how to tell the truth when his freedom depends on doing so. He's a grifter, not a true believer. And the defense can try to shred his credibility (not hard because it comes pre-shredded) but it helps to build the case and allows them to bring in evidence they might not otherwise be able to introduce.
[deleted] t1_iuy1db5 wrote
[deleted]
Graterof2evils t1_iuy3u71 wrote
And you’ll leave a guy that scrambles back to his political icons that do nothing for you. Waiting for the crumbs to trickle down or for your turn to be rich. I love when you expect people to be prosecuted with no evidence. You prove your character is the same as the liars you worship. I’m an independent and don’t play team politics. Your politics are based on false information and unproven policies.
PatrickBlackbrn t1_iuyfiw0 wrote
You have no idea what my politics are, and you forgot Mega Maga in front of trickle down dork.
[deleted] t1_iuyq69n wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuyqibl wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_iuyr1e6 wrote
[removed]
FiveUpsideDown t1_iuzf3ce wrote
Unless Trump or DeSantis wins the presidency and then Kash Patel will be pardoned.
SnooOwls5859 t1_iuzfofc wrote
No honor among thieves
AgreeableFeed9995 t1_iuzfyqd wrote
Lmao sure, Patel and all the other guys promised pardons, right?
rchart1010 t1_iuzsqj4 wrote
>Kash likely should be in prison too.
He should be under a prison. That guy is the worst kind of news.
takecarebrushyohair t1_iuu6ugc wrote
Oooo he has the dirt. Better put him in protective custody