Forsaken-Original-82 t1_ixk1sdm wrote
I wish we could get some "bad faith litigation fines" in the US.
pegothejerk t1_ixk2a07 wrote
Fines, hell, I just wish they weren't rewarded by escaping consequences and having reduced fines for appeal after appeal
ArugulaZ t1_ixlbtd2 wrote
Oh Kari Lake, we have a bill for you!
[deleted] t1_ixkacui wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixl92xf wrote
[removed]
sodo9987 t1_ixkg5x2 wrote
Too abusable. Sound in theory but in practice it’s a two way street that opens up abuse.
Nandy-bear t1_ixl12aq wrote
Slippery slope fallacy. Everything good can be abused by the bad, it's why you have rigorous protections in place to protect it, and when the abuse happens, you fight it.
rich1051414 t1_ixkiar2 wrote
I don't agree. If the court is fining people for bad faith in bad faith, the issue is much deeper than that single rule, and is neither caused nor leveraged in it's pursuit. Bad faith is bad faith, and should be punished. Arguing it could be used in bad faith is, quite frankly, an argument so weak it is actually hilarious.
akhier t1_ixkzlkh wrote
If you can't trust the judge to judge, you have deeper problems
Mr_Poop_Himself t1_ixlk216 wrote
Then we have deeper problems. I have absolutely no faith in the US Supreme Court at this point.
akhier t1_ixnrohx wrote
Yep, the highest court in the land is compromised and a lot of lower ones as well. We need some kind of reform and I have no clue what the way forward is.
sodo9987 t1_ixl02ir wrote
I don’t trust our 2 party system.
akurra_dev t1_ixmciel wrote
Republicans have been using this slippery slope fallacy for decades while literally careening us down the slope of Fascism. Enough of this bullshit: Stomping out Fascism with legal protections and regulations is not a slippery slope, it is protecting freedom from the insidious attacks of Fascists.
[deleted] t1_ixmm8ia wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments