Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

gontikins t1_ixqjtv1 wrote

Did she ever go to the police or a hospital to gather evidence of the rape within a reasonable period of time to support her accusation of rape?

Evidence is an extremely big part of a rape case. The procedure can be invasive considering that all the clothing is taken from the victim, and the victim is then subject to sample collection.

If they have the samples, why shouldn't they sue?

−34

P0Rt1ng4Duty t1_ixqp9fr wrote

Trump was court ordered to provide a dna sample. That's really all they need that they don't already have.

38

itsmariokartwii t1_ixr5pyt wrote

That’s why he’s asking… DNA collection now can only be useful for her if she provided DNA evidence when it happened.

7

P0Rt1ng4Duty t1_ixs10si wrote

She has a 'sample' of his DNA on the dress she was wearing that day. They just need some from him to compare it to.

8

gontikins t1_ixqxfav wrote

Gathering DNA from Trump has no value if she didn't go to the police or the hospital to gather evidence after Trump allegedly raped her.

Crime requires evidence. If she didn't allow the hospital or the police to gather physical evidence from HER body after she was allegedly raped, then the police have no DNA sample from 1995 or 1996 to compare to a DNA sample from Trump in the 2020s then compelling Trump to provide a DNA sample means nothing.

−21

Yousoggyyojimbo t1_ixrmufy wrote

They have a DNA sample to compare it to, collected off of the clothing she had on at the time.

20

gontikins t1_ixrrfz3 wrote

I did not read that in the article. Could you please provide your source?

−12

coondingee t1_ixrq64m wrote

This is a civil case not a criminal case. Much easier to get a conviction.

9