NotConstantine t1_it7gmjt wrote
Reply to comment by Comprehensive-Ad3963 in ACLU asks supreme court to overturn Arkansas’ anti-boycott law against Israel | Arkansas by Im__Bruce_Wayne__AMA
When the govt interferes with commerce based on the political opinion of the people currently running it, that's a free speech violation.
Doomsday31415 t1_it86x7c wrote
Uh, no it's not. That's called sanctions. Various departments set "politically motivated" requirements for companies to do business with them all the time.
Has_hog t1_it89v1p wrote
Lol. Dude do you always just read the first sentence and just go off? This “sanctions” argument is most base level, first sentence reading interpretation possible — it’s clearly more complicated than that or the aclu wouldn’t have a case to challenge the state.
[deleted] t1_it9uebv wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments