[deleted] t1_it638f0 wrote
Reply to comment by Upset-Ad4844 in ACLU asks supreme court to overturn Arkansas’ anti-boycott law against Israel | Arkansas by Im__Bruce_Wayne__AMA
[removed]
Mist_Rising t1_it6470a wrote
>The ACLU defended Nazis
They defended the first amendment in this case. Not sure if you're aware of that or deliberately trying to avoid mentioning that was the argument but Skokie was about the right to assemble.
Upset-Ad4844 t1_it697pa wrote
They took a stand back then for the right to free speech.
Free speech is ugly.
Freedom is ugly when people disagree.
That's why the right to free speech so often seems self-contradictory, at times hurtful.
It takes a lot of guts in the belief that it is ultimately for the best of all people in the long run.
Thanks for your response.
SacrificialPwn t1_it67f18 wrote
They defend civil liberties, not the person/group. A protected right to free speech is no longer protected nor a right if the state can determine what's allowed to be spoken or believed. I'd rather have a world where people can voice support or opposition to a country, than one where you are penalized for voicing either
[deleted] t1_it6buwy wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_it6qze5 wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments