[deleted] t1_irr8lfj wrote on October 10, 2022 at 1:03 PM

Reply to comment by CyanideKitty in Serial ‘jogger rapist’ to be released from Oregon prison by LuceeCarioca

[removed]

CyanideKitty t1_irrdzri wrote on October 10, 2022 at 1:48 PM

Oh I know better but knowing better didn't put a rapist behind bars because I kept being told that. Many women raped by their spouses are told that daily.

JackMitcham t1_irr9ztq wrote on October 10, 2022 at 1:15 PM

> No one fucking told you "marriage was a 24/7 consent situation"

I believe her. Lawyers are still making this case in court.

>and even if they did, you know better.

And how does that help arrest the rapist?

[deleted] t1_irraymu wrote on October 10, 2022 at 1:23 PM

[removed]

CyanideKitty t1_irre3gv wrote on October 10, 2022 at 1:49 PM

I couldn't have a case because cops refused to take a report because marriage is a 24/7 consent. This happens to many women.

[deleted] t1_irreemx wrote on October 10, 2022 at 1:51 PM

[removed]

JackMitcham t1_irrb96p wrote on October 10, 2022 at 1:26 PM

>What lawyers?

Many lawyers. Trump's lawyers, for one.

>What case?

The case that one cannot rape one's spouse. I was very clear in my original post, I don't know why you're confused.

>What rapist is getting arrested?

None, that's the point.

>Her ex-husband?

I mean, yeah. She literally said she was raped. What is confusing you? Jesus Christ man, pay attention.

[deleted] t1_irrc6j7 wrote on October 10, 2022 at 1:34 PM

[removed]

JackMitcham t1_irrh3eb wrote on October 10, 2022 at 2:12 PM

> No idea what Trump's lawyers have to do with this conversation. > >

YOU ASKED which lawyers are making this case in court.

>she stated she was told by law enforcement many years later that it was legal.

Yeah, when she tried reporting the crime. You don't have a problem with that?

>on your idiotic comments.

Enjoy the ban, I guess.