Submitted by hugglenugget t3_yesrv3 in news
Amori_A_Splooge t1_iu22kve wrote
Reply to comment by Interesting_Total_98 in Shell paid zero windfall tax in UK despite record global profits by hugglenugget
Ah so it just continues to happen as it currently does. Got it. Thanks.
Interesting_Total_98 t1_iu2c26z wrote
You missed the point. They'd like to see individual countries tax corporations more.
GreedyNovel t1_iubgtuf wrote
Why? For example, Amazon used revenue to build a very effective logistics network the likes of which were never seen before. Successful companies do societally useful things.
Governments use revenue to bomb people who live somewhere else, or create propaganda, or whatever else serves the needs of the political leaders. It isn't always used for "the people", not by a long shot.
[deleted] t1_iucm245 wrote
[deleted]
Interesting_Total_98 t1_iucmb6i wrote
Government spending mostly benefits its citizens, such as building the roads that companies to use to supply their operations. The money spent on bombs is a fraction of the budget.
GreedyNovel t1_iufy05t wrote
Corporations pay lots of tax money too. If you pick a specific corporation in a specific year, sure it's easy to find one that doesn't that year but over any given span of 5-10 years they pay up and their lawyers remind Congress about that loudly and often.
I sometimes find it funny how people accuse corporations of buying Senators to do their bidding, but then claim those same corporations aren't paying taxes. Aren't both activities ... taxes to buy influence?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments