Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Mydickradiates t1_jcq4muk wrote

Reply to comment by nutmeggerking in Levels of carcinogenic chemical near Ohio derailment site far above safe limit by Additional-Force-795

I guess it depends whether I was understanding you right, are you saying don't bother helping these people they made their bed now they can own it and hopefully that induces them to change? Because that would be bad for public health. I feel like if people who thought they shouldn't do anything to help these folks knew some of them they might think different. That's basically what I was saying

0

nutmeggerking t1_jcq7ufl wrote

>Because that would be bad for public health.

I'd make an argument that it would be in the public interest to not bail them out. If you keep voting with the mentality of "I got mine, fuck you" and insist on voting for deregulations and taxes then stick to your principles and don't go running to the government for a bailout.

Maybe they will learn a lesson about why regulations and government are important the next time they decide to vote.

Something Something personal responsibility, something something rugged individualism, something something boot straps.

1

Mydickradiates t1_jcqwvm9 wrote

unfortunately it is an ecosystem and what they do affects you, and I would prefer not to wait on them to learn the hard way or otherwise. but you can't just not help them either, so you're stuck with helping them as a humanitarian need, while acknowledging they would have been a drag either way. I have low confidence they will even learn the hard way. But then we will on top of that have a standard of not helping people as a gov't and that's not good either

so your fantasy remains fantasy I guess

0