Hot-Bint t1_jd6if58 wrote on March 22, 2023 at 4:36 AM

Is Corcoran the lawyer or Christina Bobb?

Bernies_left_mitten t1_jd6ofys wrote on March 22, 2023 at 5:47 AM

Corcoran. It's in the article.

Hot-Bint t1_jd6p91t wrote on March 22, 2023 at 5:57 AM

It wasn’t immediately clear, or I have reading comprehension problems tonight. Thanks :)

Bernies_left_mitten t1_jd6q66x wrote on March 22, 2023 at 6:09 AM

No worries! Other articles/sources indicate that the filing specifically states that Trump deliberately deceived the lawyers. Not quite sure if that means Corcoran is out of the hot seat or not, though.

Will be very interested to see what evidence they have to get this ruling, and what further evidence it yields. And/or lawyer's future testimonies.

Hot-Bint t1_jd6qrnw wrote on March 22, 2023 at 6:17 AM

Yes (new evidence for ruling)! Why I said Christina Bobb as well, didn’t she sign off on the affidavit that all boxes had been accounted for in a search she didn’t oversee to the DOJ? What happened with that

Bernies_left_mitten t1_jd96n41 wrote on March 22, 2023 at 6:57 PM

I think I recall that reports said she did, but I don't know for sure that it was her specifically (vs just "Trump's lawyer") and individually. Haven't heard anything about her in a while now, actually.

[deleted] t1_jd9k0u0 wrote on March 22, 2023 at 8:21 PM

[removed]

Dvusmnd t1_jd8mf78 wrote on March 22, 2023 at 4:50 PM

Bobb is on the hook for this too. She signed the affidavit stating there was no TS/SCI docs at MAL, but weeks later, Bickety-Bam if there weren’t in fact TS/SCI docs at MAL to the surprise of no one.